ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Open Lung Protective Extubation Following General Anesthesia (OLEXT-3)

C

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Intra-abdominal Surgery
Lung Injury
Atelectasis
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury
Anesthesia

Treatments

Other: Protective "open-lung" extubation
Other: Conventional extubation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06296173
MP-02-2024-12094

Details and patient eligibility

About

Perioperative respiratory complications are a major source of morbidity and mortality. Postoperative atelectasis plays a central role in their development. Protective "open lung" mechanical ventilation aims to minimize the occurrence of atelectasis during the perioperative period. Randomized controlled studies have been performed comparing various "open lung" ventilation protocols, but these studies report varying and conflicting effects. The interpretation of these studies is complicated by the absence of imagery supporting the pulmonary impact associated with the use of different ventilation strategies. Imaging studies suggest that the gain in pulmonary gas content in "open lung" ventilation regimens disappears within minutes after the extubation. Thus, the potential benefits of open-lung ventilation appear to be lost if, at the time of extubation, no measures are used to keep the lungs well aerated. Recent expert recommendations on good mechanical ventilation practices in the operating room conclude that there is actually no quality study on extubation.

Extubation is a very common practice for anesthesiologists as part of their daily clinical practice. It is therefore imperative to generate evidence on good clinical practice during anesthetic emergence in order to potentially identify an effective extubation strategy to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications.

Full description

The aim of this study is to establish the feasibility of a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two clinical strategies called "open lung" and "conventional" during extubation. The investigators also aim to estimate the rates of postoperative pulmonary complications in the two intervention groups.

METHODS

A multicenter internal pilot, prospective, randomized, allocation-concealed and controlled assessor-blinded study. Two hundred sixteen patients scheduled to undergo elective intra-abdominal surgery requiring general anesthesia and planned hospitalization at four Canadian hospitals, and at moderate or high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications according to the ARISCAT score will be recruited. Following the administration of standardized mechanical ventilation and after obtaining consent, participants will be randomly assigned to two groups:

Group A: Intervention group, "open lung" extubation strategy Group B: Control group, "conventional" extubation strategy.

The rate of adherence to the extubation protocol, the weekly patient recrutement rate and the 7-day postoperative pulmonary complications outcome completion rate will be measured. We will only report secondary efficacy outcome in aggregate as they will be rolled over to the definitive trial.

Enrollment

270 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (18 years of age or over)
  • Elective intra-abdominal surgery under general anesthesia.
  • Moderate or high risk of postoperative pulmonary complication according to the ARISCAT score (score of 26 or more)
  • Planned postoperative hospitalization

Exclusion criteria

  • Expected or known difficult intubation according to the treating anesthesiologist
  • Postoperative mechanical ventilation (planned or unplanned)
  • General anesthesia performed outside the main operating room

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

270 participants in 2 patient groups

Open lung extubation
Experimental group
Description:
At the beginning of emergence, patients will be positioned with the head of the bed elevated to at least 30 degrees and the FiO2 will be set at 50%. At the resumption of spontaneous ventilation or earlier at the discretion of the anesthesiologist, the ventilator will be set to pressure support ventilation mode for the rest of the emergence procedure. The pressure support level will be adjusted to obtain a volume similar to the one used prior to emergence. PEEP will be left unchanged. Anesthesiologists will be instructed not to switch off the ventilator until the patient is extubated.
Treatment:
Other: Protective "open-lung" extubation
Conventional extubation
Active Comparator group
Description:
At the beginning of emergence, patients will be positioned in a dorsal decubitus position and the FiO2 will be set at 100%. At the resumption of spontaneous ventilation or earlier at the discretion of the anesthesiologist, the ventilator will be switched off for the rest of the emergence procedure with the adjustable pressure-limiting valve open to atmosphere. Manual ventilation or assistance will be allowed, but the adjustable pressure-limiting valve will be reopened when pausing manual ventilation or assistance.
Treatment:
Other: Conventional extubation

Trial contacts and locations

4

Loading...

Central trial contact

Martin Girard, MD; Eva Amzallag, MSC

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems