ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Open Suction vs. Closed Suction in ARDS

I

Izmir Dr Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Surgery Education and Research Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Treatments

Procedure: Endotracheal aspiration

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05537974
IGHCEAH-ICU-7

Details and patient eligibility

About

The alveoli tend to collapse in patients with ARDS. Endotracheal aspiration may increase alveolar collapse by decreasing the end-expiratory lung volume. The hypothesis is that closed endotracheal aspiration led to less end-expiratory volume loss when compared to open endotracheal aspiration.

Enrollment

20 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Mechanically ventilated due to ARDS

Exclusion criteria

Hemodynamically unstable Air leaks syndrome (pneumothorax) Higher level of FiO2 (>60%) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Trial design

Primary purpose

Screening

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

20 participants in 2 patient groups

Open Suction
Other group
Description:
Endotracheal aspiration will perform after the patient disconnect from mechanical ventilation
Treatment:
Procedure: Endotracheal aspiration
Closed Suction
Other group
Description:
Endotracheal aspiration will perform without disconnection from mechanical ventilation
Treatment:
Procedure: Endotracheal aspiration

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems