Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This randomized trial compares two prescribing strategies to treat high blood pressure. One approach involves remote treatment informed by randomized trial evidence without regular monitoring of blood pressure ("fire and forget"), whilst the other involves usual care treatment with access to frequent blood pressure monitoring. The study will enrol participants with uncontrolled high blood pressure and randomize participants 1:1 to a "fire and forget" treatment group or a "more blood pressure monitoring" group for a total of 12 weeks. "Fire and forget" involves choosing the most appropriate treatment based on the highest quality evidence (randomized trial data), after which participants will stop measuring blood pressures until the end of study. The "more blood pressure monitoring" group will involve treatment as usual but with the access to frequent and high quality blood pressure monitoring.
The goal of this research is to:
Full description
RATIONALE FOR TRIAL DESIGN:
Current pharmacological treatment of hypertension involves titration of treatment according to serial BP monitoring. However, BP is intrinsically variable and subject to significant measurement and random error that leads to a notoriously poor signal-to-noise ratio. Accordingly, measurement of BPs within 1 to 2 months of starting BP lowering treatment are not associated with true treatment response, adverse effects or cardiovascular risk reduction. Two contrasting solutions include 1) 'fire and forget' by prescribing BP lowering drugs empirically based on the desired average BP response observed from placebo controlled randomised trials without measuring repeat BP or 2) continue usual care with more intensive BP monitoring to try and improve the signal-to-noise ratio.
OBJECTIVES:
The primary aim is to compare the efficacy of remote empirical prescribing of BP lowering drugs informed by randomised trial data without routine BP monitoring ('fire and forget') versus usual care enhanced with intensive BP monitoring ('intensive BP monitoring').
The secondary aims are to determine if, compared to usual care with intensive BP monitoring, remote empirical treatment of high BP is acceptable to patients, is cost-effective and safe.
PARTICIPANT ELIGIBILITY:
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
TRIAL INTERVENTION & RANDOMISATION:
All participants who meet the eligibility criteria for the trial will be randomised (1:1) to:
Fire and forget: Remote evidence informed empirical prescribing of BP lowering therapy without serial BP monitoring. Regimen chosen based on the average BP reduction and lowest risk of adverse effects observed in placebo controlled randomised trials Intensive BP monitoring: usual care as per GP prescribing enhanced with intensive BP monitoring
TRIAL OUTCOMES:
Primary: Mean difference in change in home SBP from baseline to 12 weeks
Secondary:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
120 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Nelson Wang, MD, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal