ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Optimization of NIBS for Diabetic Neuropathy Neuropathic Pain

Case Western Reserve University logo

Case Western Reserve University

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Chronic Pain
Diabetic Neuropathies

Treatments

Device: Sham
Device: Active Comparator: Active tDCS + Active TUS

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

NCT03625752
STUDY20180314-2/20201584

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in combination with Transcranial ultrasound (TUS) for the treatment of pain and functional limitations in subjects with Diabetic Neuropathic Pain.

Full description

Active stimulation will be compared with compared to SHAM stimulation in DNP patients.

20 DNP patients, 10 per group, receive stimulation or sham for 5 consecutive days, 20 min/day, followed by 2, 4, and 6 weeks post-therapy. 9 visits plus screening/baseline (total 10 visits).

Subsequently, 40 DNP patients will be enrolled, 20 per group, giving 5 consecutive days, 20 min/day, followed by 2 weeks of bi-weekly stimulation or sham for 20 min/day (total stimulations n=9) and follow-ups at 2, 4, 6, & 8 weeks post-stim): 13 visits plus screening/ baseline (total 14 visits).

Enrollment

60 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

40 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Able to provide informed consent to participate in the study.
  2. Subjects between 40 to 80 years old.
  3. Having diabetic neuropathic pain, involving at least 1 foot, with existing pain for at least 6 months, and having pain on at least half the days in the past 6 months with an average of at least a 4 on a 0-10 VAS scale).
  4. Having pain resistant to common analgesics and medications for first-line therapy of chronic pain such as Tylenol, Aspirin, Ibuprofen, Soma, Parafon Forte DCS, Zanaflex, Codeine, etc.
  5. Must have the ability to feel pain as self-reported.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Subject is pregnant.
  2. Contraindications to tDCS in conjunction with TUS, i.e. metallic implant in the brain or implanted brain medical devices
  3. History of alcohol or drug abuse within the past 6 months as self-reported.
  4. Use of carbamazepine within the past 6 months as self-reported.
  5. Suffering from severe depression (with a PHQ 9 score of ≥ 10).
  6. History of neurological disorders as self-reported.
  7. History of unexplained fainting spells as self-reported.
  8. History of severe head injury resulting in more than a momentary loss of consciousness as self-reported.
  9. History of neurosurgery as self-reported.
  10. Unstable pain (defined as pain intensities that vary by more than 4 points on 0-10 VAS scale over the 1-week period of trial run-in).

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

60 participants in 2 patient groups

Active Comparator: Active tDCS + Active TUS
Active Comparator group
Description:
Subjects in the experimental group will undergo 20 minutes of active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and active transcranial ultrasound (TUS).
Treatment:
Device: Active Comparator: Active tDCS + Active TUS
Sham
Sham Comparator group
Description:
Subjects in the sham group will undergo 20 minutes of sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and sham transcranial ultrasound (TUS).
Treatment:
Device: Sham

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Central trial contact

Kimberly Puskus; Megan O'Neill Miller

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems