ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Optimization of Post-transplantation Benadamustine and Cyclophosphamide in Patients With High-risk Myeloid Malignancies and a Partially Mismatched Donor (APTBCy)

S

St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University

Status and phase

Enrolling
Phase 2

Conditions

Myeloprolipherative Neoplsm
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)
Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Treatments

Drug: Abatacept (Orencia)
Drug: Ruxolitinib

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07238712
30/25-n

Details and patient eligibility

About

Optimization of bendamustine-containg graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis to reduce the incidence of secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and GVHD

Full description

Prognosis of patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HCT) for high-risk myeloid malignancies, including refractory acute myeloid leukemia, with standard HCT technologies have relatively poor prognosis with 10-30% long-term disease-free survival. One of the approaches to augment graft-versus-leukemia effect the use of post-transplantation bendamustine in graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Despite high frequency of responses and durable remissions after this approach majority of patients develop a serious complication - cytokine release syndrome, which can be life-threatening in some patients. The combination bendamustine (PTB) and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) facilitates comparable graft-versus leukemia effect to PTB, but with better safety profile and reduced incidence of severe cytokine release syndrome.

Enrollment

60 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 70 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with indication for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Patients with <10/10 HLA-matched related or unrelated donor available. The donor and recipient must be identical by the following genetic loci: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-Cw, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1.
  • Peripheral blood stem cells or bone marrow as a graft source
  • Diagnosis:

Acute myeloid leukemia Chronic myeloid leukemia, Ph+ Myelodysplastic Syndromes Myeloprolipherative neoplasms - High-risk disease defined as: Acute myeloid leukemia: >5% of clonal blasts in bone marrow despite adequate previous induction therapy or allogeneic stem cell transplantation Myelodysplastic Syndrome: >5% of blasts despite previous therapy Myeloid malignancy with with -7 or complex karyotype, or p53 mutation regardless of blast count in bone marrow Treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome Second or subsequent allogeneic HCT after relapse of a myeloid malignancy Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia Myeloprolipherative neoplasms, unclassifiable

- No severe concurrent illness

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with indication for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Patients with <10/10 HLA-matched related or unrelated donor available. The donor and recipient must be identical by the following genetic loci: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-Cw, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1.
  • Peripheral blood stem cells or bone marrow as a graft source
  • Diagnosis:

Acute myeloid leukemia Chronic myeloid leukemia, Ph+ Myelodysplastic Syndromes Myeloprolipherative neoplasms - High-risk disease defined as: Acute myeloid leukemia: >5% of clonal blasts in bone marrow despite adequate previous induction therapy or allogeneic stem cell transplantation Myelodysplastic Syndrome: >5% of blasts despite previous therapy Myeloid malignancy with with -7 or complex karyotype, or p53 mutation regardless of blast count in bone marrow Treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome Second or subsequent allogeneic HCT after relapse of a myeloid malignancy Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia Myeloprolipherative neoplasms, unclassifiable

- No severe concurrent illness

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

60 participants in 3 patient groups

Experimental: Test cohort 1 - ruxolitinib
Experimental group
Description:
Days +3 through +4: Bendamustine 50 mg/m2 iv x 2 days; Days +3 through +4: Cyclophosphamide 25 mg/kg iv x 2 days; Days -1 through +21: ruxolitinib 10 mg/kg/day p.o.; mycophenolate mofetil Days +5 through +35 30 mg/kg/day p.o.; Days +5 through +100: Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg/day with further correction by concentration
Treatment:
Drug: Ruxolitinib
Test cohort 2 - abatacept
Experimental group
Description:
Days +3 through +4: Bendamustine 50 mg/m2 iv x 2 days; Days +3 through +4: Cyclophosphamide 25 mg/kg iv x 2 days; Days -1 through +21: ruxolitinib 10 mg/kg/day p.o.; mycophenolate mofetil Days +5 through +35 30 mg/kg/day p.o.; Days +5 through +100: Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg/day with further correction by concentration
Treatment:
Drug: Abatacept (Orencia)
Experimental: Expansion cohort
Experimental group
Description:
Days +3 through +4: Bendamustine 50 mg/m2 iv x 2 days; Days +3 through +4: Cyclophosphamide 25 mg/kg iv x 2 days; Days -1,+5, +14, +21 abatacept 10 mg/kg/day i.v.; Days +5 through +100: Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg/day with further correction by concentration
Treatment:
Drug: Abatacept (Orencia)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Alexandr D Kulagin, MD, Prof; Ivan S Moiseev, MD, Prof.

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems