Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
Background:
Intravenous (IV) loop-diuretics have been a key component in treating pulmonary edema since the nineteen sixties and has a Class 1 recommendation in the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for heart failure. Conversely, vasodilation was downgraded in the treatment of acute heart failure due to a lack of trials that compare vasodilation with loop-diuretics in a hyperacute clinical setting. This clinical equipoise will be tested in a trial including patients with pulmonary congestion immediately at hospital admission.
Primary objective:
To determine the superior strategy of loop-diuretics (furosemide), vasodilation (nitrates) or the combination during emergency treatment.
Design: Investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial with 1:1:1 allocation.
Intervention:
Intervention-phase will last 6 hours from study-inclusion, and patients will be allocated to one of three groups:
Full description
IV-loop diuretics are a central part of acute treatment of pulmonary edema and is recommended in guidelines (Class 1 recommendation) with a higher recommendation as compared to vasodilation, which was downgraded from Ia to IIb in the 2021 guidelines for heart failure. However, the effects of loop-diuretics alone or in combination with nitrates compared to nitrates alone is unknown and should be investigated in adequately powered prospective trials to optimize acute treatment of these patients.
Trial objective The primary objective is to determine the superior strategy of urgent treatment (starting within 3 hours after hospital-admission) of pulmonary edema. Strategies are: 1. Diuretics (Furosemide), 2. Vasodilation (nitrates), 3. A combination of both furosemide and nitrates. Patient-outcome will be evaluated through the primary endpoint as described elsewhere.
Hypothesis:
Iv nitrates in combination with iv furosemide are superior compared to iv furosemide alone or iv nitrates alone during initial (first 6 hours) in-hospital treatment of pulmonary edema. "Superior" is defined as a significant benefit on the primary outcome.
Study design The study is an investigator-initiated, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter, interventional, clinical trial. Following successful completion of screening procedures, patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to receive either of the 3 treatments-strategies.
Since patients are in cardio-respiratory and mental stress, informed consent prior to the intervention will be impossible. Instead, a legal guardian will be contacted and asked for consent in addition to next of kind and patients regaining mental ability.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
Age ≥ 18 years
Acute (within minutes to days) onset or worsening of subjective dyspnea*
Systolic blood pressure ≥100 mmHg
Oxygen saturation <94% or need of oxygen
Signs or suspicion of congestion (peripheral edema, rales, and/or clinical suspicion of congestion) *
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria are purposely liberal, so patients can be included in accordance with everyday clinical practice. However, a safety criterion will be implemented:
If blood pressure drops below 90 mmHg in 2 measurements with 5 minutes apart and/or if urine production is below 50 ml after 1 hour, the intervention will be stopped, and patients can receive furosemide and nitrates freely.
We purposely chose not to exclude patients with aortic stenosis, since observational studies did not find excess risk of given nitrates to patients with pulmonary edema and aortic stenosis
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
1,104 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Johannes Grand, MD, Phd, MPH; Jens Jakob Thune, MD, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal