ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Optimizing Induction Chemotherapy Regimens for ND Elderly AML Patients Who Are Eligible for Intense Chemotherapy

I

Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, China

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Treatments

Other: Different induction chemotherapy regimens

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06066242
IIT2023059

Details and patient eligibility

About

The optimal induction chemotherapy regimen for newly diagnosed elderly AML patients who are eligible for intense chemotherapy is currently not well defined. Thus, we intend to conduct a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three different induction regimens (Ven+AZA vs DA/IA 3+7 vs DA/IA 2+5+VEN). A total of 90 patients will be enrolled in this study and segregated into thress groups with 30 in each group. Patients who achieve CR/CRi/CRh after using different induction regimens will receive the same consolidation and maintenance therapy. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is recommended for patients in the high-risk group or those with persist MRD positivity. After completion of the treatment phase, patients entered the follow-up period.

Enrollment

90 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

60 to 75 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Able to understand the study and voluntarily sign informed consent.
  2. Age: 60~75 years old, gender unlimited.
  3. Patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia according to "The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia" who haven't been treated.
  4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) physical state score: 0-2.
  5. Fit for intensive chemotherapy.
  6. The function of main organs should meet the following standards before treatment: Kidney: serum creatinine ≤ 2× upper limit of normal range (ULN); Liver: total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × ULN, AST and ALT ≤ 2.5× ULN; Heart: myocardial enzymes ≤ 2× ULN and normal ejection fraction by cardiac color doppler ultrasound

Exclusion criteria

  1. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia
  2. Patients with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 or CBFB::MYH11 fusion gene
  3. Patients with BCR::ABL fusion gene
  4. Patients who have received a prior treatment for AML with chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents or venetoclax before.
  5. Patients with concurrent malignant tumors requiring treatment
  6. Patients with active heart disease defined as one or more of the following: (1) Uncontrolled or symptomatic angina pectoris;(2) A myocardial infarction 6 months before enrolled; (3)Arrhythmia needed medication or with severe clinical symptoms;(4)Uncontrolled or symptomatic congestive heart failure (NYHA> grade 2);(5)Left ventricular ejection fraction below the lower limit of the normal range.
  7. Uncontrolled active serious infections that could, in the investigator's opinion, potentially interfere with the completion of treatment

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

90 participants in 3 patient groups

AZA+VEN
Experimental group
Description:
Two courses of azacitidine combined with venetoclax as induction regimen
Treatment:
Other: Different induction chemotherapy regimens
DA/IA 3+7
Experimental group
Description:
Daunorubicin or Idarubicin ×3 days combined with cytarabine × 7 days as induction regimen
Treatment:
Other: Different induction chemotherapy regimens
DA/IA 2+5+VEN
Experimental group
Description:
Daunorubicin or Idarubicin ×2 days, cytarabine × 5 days combined with venetoclax as induction regimen
Treatment:
Other: Different induction chemotherapy regimens

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Hui Wei, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems