Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this prospective, randomized, open-label study is to compare two diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF): the addition of an oral thiazide diuretic to intravenous bolus (IVB) loop diuretic will be compared to transition from IVB to continuous infusion (CI) loop diuretic.
Full description
Patients hospitalized for ADHF secondary to fluid overload and who are experiencing an inadequate response to IVB furosemide and require additional diuresis will be enrolled. Patients will be randomized to one of two treatment arms: the addition of oral metolazone to continued IVB furosemide versus transition from IVB to CI furosemide. A suggested algorithm for initial dosing and titration of these two diuretic strategies will be provided. Baseline and daily data collection will include various efficacy and safety endpoints including daily net urine output and weight, patient and physician global assessment scale, length of stay, 30-day death or rehospitalization, vital signs, electrolytes, and renal function. Clinically meaningful efficacy and safety endpoints will be compared.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
Hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) secondary to fluid overload as defined by the presence of at least
Inadequate response to IV diuretics and requiring additional diuresis as determined by primary medical team
Received less than six doses of IV furosemide OR enrolled within 72 hours of hospital admission
Anticipated need for intravenous diuretic therapy for at least 48 hours
Able to provide informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
11 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal