Organizational Approaches to TWH for Low-Income Workers

President and Fellows of Harvard College

Status: Completed

Conditions: Work-related Injury

Treatments: Other: Front Line Worker Pilot Project

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04913168

TWH for Low Income Workers

Details and patient eligibility

About

There is an urgent need for evidence-based interventions to reduce risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and improve health and safety behaviors for low-income workers. Upstream interventions addressing these organizational characteristics and work experiences may be especially effective in preventing adverse health outcomes because they address underlying sources of elevated risk particularly important for low-wage workers. Low-wage workers have less schedule control, more irregular working hours, and shortened breaks due to time pressure to complete work tasks. The objective is to develop and test feasible intervention methods to modify the work organization and contribute to reductions in MSD risk, and improvements work-related well-being and job satisfaction. First, this study will identify characteristics of the work organization that can be feasibly modified through changes in management practices, based on interviews with food service managers and focus groups with workers. Second, the investigators will determine the feasibility and potential efficacy of an integrated TWH intervention in improving workers' ergonomic practices, MSD symptom, as well as in changing the work organization and environment related to work-related well-being and job satisfaction.

The contribution of this study will be significant because it is expected to contribute to reducing disparities in these health outcomes by directly intervening on an underlying source of these disparities.

Full description

The food service industry employs 9.5 million workers in the U.S, many of whom are at elevated risk for a range of poor health outcomes. NIOSH's Total Worker Health™ (TWH) Program provides an innovative approach for addressing the shared pathways in the work organization and environment that impact both MSD risk and health and safety behaviors. This study takes advantage of an unusual opportunity to demonstrate the impact of changes in the work organization in collaboration with an industry partner that has committed to making such changes in concert with this study. Our central hypothesis is that an intervention targeting the work organization, as well as the work environment will show promising improvements in MSD outcomes and improvements in work-related well-being and job satisfaction.

The Specific Aims of this study include:

1. Identify factors in the work organization, expected to be associated with MSD risk and work-related well-being and job satisfaction, which can be feasibly modified through changes in management practices. The investigators will conduct formative research using qualitative data from workers and managers to explore two overarching issues to inform intervention development specific to this setting: (a) What work organizational factors do workers perceive as priorities for their safety and health? (b) What factors in the work organization do worksite and district managers believe can be feasibly modified through changes in policies and practices? The investigators will additionally explore barriers and facilitators to these changes, and factors contributing to sustainability.
2. Determine the feasibility and potential efficacy of an integrated TWH intervention designed to improve the work organization and environment, workers' MSD symptoms, ergonomic practices, and work-related well-being and job satisfaction. To provide the next level of evidence and prepare for a full-scale randomized control trial (RCT), the investigators will conduct a proof-of-concept (PoC) trial to evaluate an integrated TWH intervention in ten food service worksites randomly assigned to intervention and control conditions, to: (a) assess the feasibility of intervention delivery and the acceptability of the intervention; and (b) provide preliminary estimates of baseline levels, change from baseline to final, and intra-class correlation. The investigators will explore the working hypothesis that between pre- and post-intervention, compared to workers in control worksites, workers in intervention sites will report greater improvements in the primary outcomes, including ergonomic practices and MSD symptoms, work-related well-being and job satisfaction; and secondary outcomes, including improvements in the work organization and environment.

This PoC intervention will be tested in10 food service worksites randomly assigned to intervention and control. The 13-month intervention will target changes in the organizational and physical work environment and management practices, and supporting safe ergonomic practices and factors related to work-related wellbeing and job satisfaction. The investigators will compare differences between intervention and control sites in changes between pre- and post-intervention in worker health and safety behaviors and MSD symptoms through surveys of workers, and in the work organization and environment through manager surveys and on-site walk-through's. A rigorous process evaluation will be used to assess intervention feasibility. The contribution of this study will be significant because it is expected to contribute to reducing disparities in these health outcomes by directly intervening on an underlying source of these disparities.

Enrollment: 197 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• All front line workers including chefs, cooks, food preparers, servers, dishwashers, and cashiers

Exclusion criteria

• Front Line workers with supervisory responsibilities

Trial design

Primary purpose: Prevention

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

197 participants in 2 patient groups

Control Group

Experimental group

Description:

Control Group; no intervention

Treatment:

Other: Front Line Worker Pilot Project

Intervention Group

Experimental group

Description:

Intervention Group; receives 13 month intervention

Treatment:

Other: Front Line Worker Pilot Project