ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment and Its Relationship to Autonomic Nervous System Activity

University of Oklahoma (OU) logo

University of Oklahoma (OU)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Healthy

Treatments

Procedure: Sham
Procedure: OMT
Procedure: Placebo

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT00516984
OUIRB 12024

Details and patient eligibility

About

The relationship between Osteopathic Manipulative Therapy (OMT) and the autonomic nervous system is poorly understood. This study quantifies that relationship and demonstrates a cause and effect. It is hypothesized that cervical myofascial release increases vagal tone.

Full description

For most osteopathic physicians the validation of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) has been largely observational and based on patient outcomes such as improvement in pain scales, range of motion, and other empiric measures.1,2 However, the osteopathic profession has long recognized a relationship between the autonomic nervous system and the function of the body in health and disease, although there is relatively little quantitative data evaluating the relationship between manipulation and the autonomic nervous system.3,4

A theoretical basis for the action of OMT and its effect in the body has been advanced based on autonomic activation causing concomitant vasodilatation, smooth muscle relaxation, and increased blood flow, resulting in improved range of motion, decrease in pain perception, or change in tissue. Until recently this association remained largely a theoretical consideration due to the inability to accurately measure autonomic activity directly. Over the past two decades indirect methods have been developed and refined to provide noninvasive markers of autonomic balance,5,6 with heart rate variability (HRV) being commonly used. HRV is based on the inherent variation of the R-to-R intervals of a standard electrocardiogram (ECG), with these variations largely due to changes in autonomic balance at the sinus node.6-8

Spectral analysis of heart rate variability has been used to study autonomic balance in humans, and it is generally accepted that the high frequency (HF) component (0.15-0.4 Hz) can be used as a marker for vagal modulation of heart rate. Although it is tempting to use the low frequency (LF) component (0.04-0.15 Hz) as a marker for sympathetic activity, its specificity is less clear. Pagani and colleagues9,10 have hypothesized that when the LF component is expressed in normalized units (LFnu) it becomes a better marker of sympathetic modulation of heart rate. For most studies using spectral analysis, the LF/HF ratio is used and considered by many to be a good index of sympathovagal balance.6,7,9,10

The confidence given to the LF/HF ratio accurately reflecting autonomic balance is significantly influenced by experimental design. A tilt protocol involving postural change from horizontal to upright can be used to calibrate the change in the LF/HF ratio which occurs between the two positions and thus set a physiological range for sympathetic and vagal modulation of heart rate. An experimental procedure then can be implemented where comparisons are made of the changes in the LF/HF ratios that occur when the body is shifted from the horizontal to the upright position under conditions with application of an intervention versus without the intervention. In this manner, an experimentally mediated change in LF/HF ratio (i.e., with intervention) can be calibrated against a physiologically relevant change in ratio (i.e., without intervention).

This approach was used by these investigators in a pilot study (n=9 healthy, adult volunteers, 3 females and 6 males) which showed that the LF/HF ratio changed from a mean of 1.75+1.40 (mean+SD) in the horizontal position to a mean of 6.00+1.20 in the 50-degree head-up position. This change reflects an increase in sympathetic tone. Mean heart rate in these subjects increased from 61+7 bpm to 78+2 bpm in the head-up position. The subjects then were treated in the 50-degree head-up position with an OMT procedure, cervical myofascial release, which is thought to increase vagal tone. After the procedure was applied, the LF/HF ratio decreased back down to 1.75+1.58, even though the subjects were still in the head-up position. These data support the initial hypothesis that specific OMT procedures can modulate vagal tone, and also provide information relating to the significance of the LF/HF change. That is, the application of OMT reversed the increase in the ratio that occurs in the 50-degree head-up position.

We conducted a continuation project to further examine the association between OMT and autonomic nervous system activity as demonstrated by HRV, studying the hypothesis that cervical myofascial release increased vagal tone. In a within subjects (repeated measures) design, we examined the effect of OMT on HRV in comparison with sham treatment (touch only) and control (no touch) conditions.

Enrollment

30 patients

Sex

All

Ages

19 to 50 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Twenty-eight (28) study subjects then were selected by their response to a general questionnaire, which indicated suitability for the study, and assessed by the following inclusion criteria:

  • written informed consent
  • normal healthy adults older than 19 years and younger than 50 years
  • normal ECG
  • normal blood pressure based on criteria published in the Seventh Report of the U.S. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-7).

Exclusion criteria

  • Exclusion criteria included chronic cardiovascular disease (heart failure, myocardial infarction, or hypertension)
  • diabetes
  • asthma
  • pregnancy
  • smoking
  • premature ventricular contractions exceeding 20% of total heart beats
  • resting supine heart rate greater than 75 bpm or less than 45 bpm, systolic blood pressure greater than 140 mmHg or less than 90 mmHg
  • failure of heart rate to increase with passive tilt (50-degrees head-up)
  • Long-distance runners and other conditioned athletes also were excluded

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

30 participants in 3 patient groups, including a placebo group

Placebo
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
No-touch control condition applied while subject was at a 50-degree head-up tilt.
Treatment:
Procedure: Placebo
Sham
Sham Comparator group
Description:
Touch-only sham treatment applied while subject was at a 50-degree head-up tilt.
Treatment:
Procedure: Sham
OMT
Active Comparator group
Description:
Cervical myofascial OMT applied while subject was at a 50-degree head-up tilt.
Treatment:
Procedure: OMT

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems