ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Outcomes in Children With Pre-operative Residual Hearing

University of North Carolina (UNC) logo

University of North Carolina (UNC)

Status

Completed

Conditions

High Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Impairment
Hearing Disorders in Children

Treatments

Device: Electric Acoustic Speech Processor: Electric-acoustic stimulation fitting
Device: Electric Acoustic Speech Processor: Full-electric stimulation fitting

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

NCT03379870
17-2360

Details and patient eligibility

About

Purpose: Routine clinical care and pilot study data has shown evidence of postoperative hearing preservation in pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients. The primary aim of this study is to investigate speech perception performance in pediatric CI recipients with functional pre-operative hearing.

Participants: Two cohorts of CI recipients aged 6 through 17 years who had pre-operative low frequency residual hearing. Subjects in Arm 1 (EAS Arm; electric-acoustic stimulation) will present with a post-operative low frequency pure tone average (125, 250, and 500 Hz) of ≤ 75 dB HL, and those in Arm 2 (FES Arm; full-electric stimulation) will present with a post-operative low frequency pure tone average (LFPTA) that exceeds 75 dB HL.

Procedures (methods): Subjects will complete speech perception and quality of life testing during post-operative intervals. Subjects in the EAS Arm will be evaluated with combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS). Subjects in FES Arm will be evaluated with FES alone.

Full description

As children with more residual hearing are receiving cochlear implants (CIs), there is an opportunity to preserve that hearing and provide combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). The primary aim of this study is to investigate speech perception performance in pediatric CI recipients with functional pre-operative hearing. Specifically, the investigators intend to compare speech understanding using EAS and traditional full electric stimulation.

While hearing preservation rates are good, they are not guaranteed. Children with progressive hearing loss may continue to lose hearing, even if they maintain some residual hearing immediately after surgery. As a secondary aim, the investigators intend to study outcomes in children who do not maintain residual hearing and are fit with traditional CI programming methods. Children with more residual hearing are being implanted, and this study design allows validation of outcomes in both populations.

Subject enrollment will occur on the initial stimulation date. Those who have maintained a low frequency hearing average of 75 dB HL or better will be fit with a SONNET EAS or SONNET 2 EAS device using combined acoustic and electric stimulation. Those who have not maintained low frequency hearing will be fit with a SONNET EAS or SONNET 2 EAS device using electric stimulation only. Subjects will be followed at regular intervals throughout the year duration of the study and will be tested on measures of speech understanding in quiet, speech understanding in noise, quality of life, and discrimination of prosody or pitch changes.

Enrollment

28 patients

Sex

All

Ages

60 to 215 months old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 5 through 17 years
  • Spoken English as the primary language (speech perception testing conducted in English).
  • Recipient of a MED-EL SYNCHRONY Cochlear Implant device.
  • Pre-operative LFPTA of ≤ 75 dB HL.
  • Willing and able to participate in study procedures.
  • Realistic parental/patient expectations.
  • Language skills judged to be adequate enough to perform study tasks.

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to perform open set speech perception due to oral motor delays.
  • Inability to perform test battery due to behavior or cognitive impairment
  • Unwilling or unable to participate in study procedures.
  • Cochlear nerve deficiency.
  • Anatomical considerations that necessitated surgical modifications such as ossification, incomplete insertion, or placement in scala vestibuli.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

28 participants in 2 patient groups

EAS Arm
Experimental group
Description:
Subjects who receive a CI and present with a post-operative LFPTA of ≤ 75 dB HL. Electric Acoustic Speech Processor: Electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) fitting.
Treatment:
Device: Electric Acoustic Speech Processor: Electric-acoustic stimulation fitting
FES Arm
Experimental group
Description:
Subjects with pre-operative low frequency hearing who receive a CI and present with a post-operative LFPTA of \> 75 dB HL. Electric Acoustic Speech Processor: Full-electric stimulation (FES) fitting
Treatment:
Device: Electric Acoustic Speech Processor: Full-electric stimulation fitting

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems