ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Outcomes of Conventional Root Canal Treatment Compared to Regenerative Endodontics, and Cleaning and Shaping Only in Mature Upper First Premolars

A

Ain Shams University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Regenerative Endodontic Treatment
Necrotic Mature First Premolar
Cleaning and Shaping Only With Proper Coronal Seal

Treatments

Procedure: Cleaning and shaping only
Other: cell homing

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07609732
28/2/1993

Details and patient eligibility

About

It was to compare clinically between the success of the primary endodontic treatment, regeneration, and only cleaning and shaping in necrotic mature first premolars with apical periodontitis

Full description

a- Fifty four patients were enrolled and screened for eligibility b- Participants were randomly assigned to three groups (n=18 per group) i- Group [CRCT]: Conventional root canal treatment (n=18) ii- Group [REP] : Regenerative endodontic treatment (REP) (n=18), cell homing technique was used , and MTA was placed 3mm into the canals , the access was sealed by light cured glass ionomer then composite iii- Group [C.S]: Only cleaning and shaping (n=18) the same steps of REP but without bleeding induction and MTA was placed 3mm into the canals , the access was sealed by light cured glass ionomer then composite

Enrollment

54 patients

Sex

Male

Ages

20 to 50 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: 20-50 years
  • Medically free
  • The patient should have the upper first premolar that needs endodontic treatment with apical periodontitis
  • Necrotic teeth
  • Participants were willing to commit to the entire period of the trial and agreed to sign the written consent after a full explanation of the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
  • If the premolar is non restorable
  • If the premolar will need a post and core
  • Vertical root fracture
  • Open apex
  • Presence of any systemic disease or allergic reactions.
  • Vulnerable group; prisoners, pregnant females, mentally ill, etc…

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

54 participants in 3 patient groups

Control group
No Intervention group
Description:
conventional endodontic treatment, the canals were filled by conventional gutta percha with proper coronal seal
Regeneration group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Cell homing via bleeding induction was done, MTA was applied into the canals at a depth of 3mm, and the access was sealed by light-cured glass ionomer, then composite restorations were placed
Treatment:
Other: cell homing
Cleaning and shaping only group
Experimental group
Description:
Aseptic techniques were used while using the irrigation activation technique to enhance the irrigation effects, after then MTA was applied into the canals at a depth of 3mm, and the access was sealed by light-cured glass ionomer then composite restorations were placed to ensure proper coronal seal
Treatment:
Procedure: Cleaning and shaping only

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems