Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this retrospective study is to compare the long-term follow-up outcomes of pulses field ablation (PFA) Vs. radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). The main question to answer is:
Does the PFA was more effecient and safer that RFA for treatment of PSVT during procedure and after 1-year follow-up? Researchers will compare the acute and long-term efficiency and safety between PFA and RFA.
Full description
The goal of this retrospective study is to compare the long-term follow-up outcomes of PFA Vs. RFA for the patients with PSVT. The main question to answer is:
Does the PFA was more effecient and safer that RFA for treatment of PSVT during procedure and after 1-year follow-up? Researchers will compare the acute and long-term efficiency and safety between PFA and RFA.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
428 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Caijie Shen, MD,PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal