Pain Care at Home to Amplify Function (Pain CHAMP)
Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
Details and patient eligibility
About
This project aims to test simultaneously the effectiveness of telemedicine and collaborative management (TCM) vs. TCM plus Cooperative Pain Education and Self-Management (COPES) on patient level outcomes and the impact of site-tailored Implementation Facilitation to work toward long term opioid therapy dose reduction. Pain CHAMP is a patient-level randomized hybrid II effectiveness-implementation trial comparing TCM vs. TCM + COPES on the primary composite outcome of pain interference and OUD/misuse symptoms.
Full description
Pain CHAMP is a patient-level randomized hybrid II effectiveness-implementation trial comparing TCM vs. TCM + COPES on the primary composite outcome of pain interference and OUD/misuse symptoms. The investigators have developed two evidence-based collaborative care interventions that use focused resources to assist primary care providers (PCPs) in meeting the two main challenges in managing care for patients on long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) with chronic pain (CP) and opioid use disorder (OUD)/misuse: 1) reassessment of LTOT and switch to medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) as indicated and 2) ready access to evidence-based behavioral pain treatment. Both interventions are entirely virtual and thus serve the needs of many underserved populations. Telemedicine Collaborative Management (TCM) features clinical pharmacists leading LTOT reassessment and buprenorphine (BUP) initiation in consultation with a BUP-prescribing physician. The TCM model is effective in decreasing pain interference, achieving LTOT dose reduction, BUP initiation and continuation, and shows greater patient engagement than the more resource intensive Integrated Pain Team comparator arm. Cooperative Pain Education and Self-Management (COPES), a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program delivered via telehealth that improves pain interference, improves access to evidence-based behavioral pain treatment.
While TCM and COPES are established interventions, the additional value of COPES-as a behavioral CP intervention paired with the pharmacologic-focused TCM for chronic pain and LTOT misuse/OUD--has not been tested. To advance systems-level approaches to addressing co-occurring CP, LTOT and OUD/misuse, this study will make two important steps forward. First, the investigators will use a pragmatic approach and randomize at the site-level so all eligible patients will receive standard-of-care treatment. Second, the study will train PCPs in how to re-assume care of patients' post-collaborative care to maintain gains made during the intervention/s. To meet these goals, the team of investigators with expertise conducting high-impact CP and OUD research propose Pain Care at Home to Amplify Function (Pain CHAMP) a hybrid II trial to test simultaneously the effectiveness of TCM vs. TCM plus COPES on patient level outcomes and the impact of site-tailored Implementation Facilitation on successful uptake of each intervention with the following specific aims:
Aim 1: Compare the effectiveness of pharmacist-led TCM vs TCM plus COPES on the primary composite outcome of improved pain interference and opioid safety as measured by opioid misuse or opioid use disorder. As secondary outcomes, we will compare groups on alcohol use, anxiety, depression, and sleep.
Aim 2: Evaluate the effectiveness of Implementation Facilitation for TCM and COPES on Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) guided outcomes using mixed qualitative-quantitative methods.
Aim 3: Examine the cost-effectiveness of TCM plus COPES, relative to TCM, on the primary composite outcome.
This study receives support from and included in the HEAL Initiative (https://heal.nih.gov/).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Participants:
- Engaged in TCM intervention (with or without COPES)
Providers:
- Engaged with a participating study site
Exclusion criteria
Participants:
- Not engaged in TCM intervention
Providers:
- Not engaged with a participating study site
Trial design
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
259 participants in 2 patient groups
Trial contacts and locations
Loading...
Central trial contact
Anne Black, PhD; Maria Zenoni, MS
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal