Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The use of a connective tissue graft harvested from the palate is currently one of the most effective and predictable alternatives for the correction of periodontal and peri-implant defects, but the discomfort generated in the palate is sometimes greater than mucogingival surgery. For this reason, we found the need to use different materials for palatal protection. In one group we will use light-cured fluid resin compared to another group a self-adhesive dressing to check which of these materials provides less postoperative pain generated by the harvest of a free gingival graft.
Full description
The postoperative pain generated by the harvest of a free gingival graft for the correction of periodontal or peri-implant defects, it's greater when it is not adequately protected and until the reepithelialization of the area is complete. For this reason, it was decided to use two materials to compare the effectiveness in reducing postoperative pain in grafts larger than 15 mm. A control group will be treated with a hemostatic collagen sponge and photocured fluid resin, adhered to the palatal surfaces of the neighboring teeth using an adhesive protocol and X-shaped sutures. Another experimental group will be treated with a hemostatic sponge and placement of a self-adhesive dressing stabilized by X-shaped sutures to ensure its permanence in the mouth. The participants will fill out a daily visual analog scale form for 14 days until the removal of the materials. Finally, the results will be tabulated and compared to provide a conclusion of our study.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
30 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal