ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Pain Perception of Dental Local Anesthesia Using "DentalVibe Comfort System" in a Group of Egyptian Children

Cairo University (CU) logo

Cairo University (CU)

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Dental Anxiety

Treatments

Device: traditional dental injection
Device: injection using DentalVibe comfort system

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03033628
CEBC-CU-2017-01-06

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this study is to compare pain during maxillary infiltration local anesthesia injection with the aid of DentalVibe comfort system in comparison to maxillary infiltration injection alone in pediatric dental patients.

Full description

The aim of this study is to compare pain during maxillary infiltration local anesthesia injection with the aid of DentalVibe comfort system in comparison to maxillary infiltration injection alone.

Intervention:

History taking from the child and the parent including personal, medical and dental history as in the examination sheet (Appendix A) to assess inclusion criteria.

Clinical procedure:

Intervention group:

Clinical examination using mirror and probe to assess inclusion criteria. Before initiating the treatment, the site of the injection will be dried then prepped with antiseptic solution swab, then a topical anaesthetic agent (topical anesthetics 20% benzocaine) will be applied with a cotton tip applicator for 60 sec.

Demonstration will be performed by putting the device into direct contact with the children's nails before applying the device intraorally.

The cheek will be retracted and the device will be turned on.

1mL of local anesthetic solution (articaine hypochloride 4% with 1:100.000 epinephrine, Septodont) will be injected using a 27 gauge needle which will be delivered over 1 min.

Control group:

AS that of the intervention group except, the device will be used only as a cheek retractor during the injection, but will be turned off.

Assessment:

Objective assessment will be performed by observing the patients behavior using the FLAAC scale during the anesthetic injection and needle insertion.

Subjective evaluation will be obtained using the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale.

Enrollment

21 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

6 to 7 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Healthy children aged 6-7 years old.
  2. Apparently healthy Children.
  3. Cooperative children.
  4. Children with carious maxillary bilateral primary molars indicated for extraction.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Children who are allergic to amide group.
  2. Children with Neurologic disorders.
  3. Children with mental disability.
  4. Presence of periapical or gingival legion.
  5. Severe Gingivitis.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

21 participants in 2 patient groups

DV group
Experimental group
Description:
Device: injection using DentalVibe comfort system. giving maxillary infiltration dental local anesthesia with the aid of "DentalVibe comfort system" on one side of the maxillary arch prior extraction of primary molar tooth
Treatment:
Device: injection using DentalVibe comfort system
C group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Device: traditional dental injection giving maxillary infiltration dental local anesthesia without the aid of "DentalVibe comfort system" on the other side of the maxillary arch prior extraction of primary molar tooth
Treatment:
Device: traditional dental injection

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

Muaaz Hilal, DR

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems