Pain Relief and and Peripheral Perfusion Index During Erector Spinae Block

Keimyung University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Block; Block, Fascicular; Spinae

Treatments: Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06963424

2025-02-028

Details and patient eligibility

About

The primary endpoint of this study is to compare the pain relief and peripheral perfusion index when local anesthetics injected in different final target area during lumbar erector spinae block The secondary endpoint of this study is to compare the procedure related pain

Full description

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a less invasive, safer, and technically easy alternative procedure to conventional neuraxial anesthetic techniques. In contrast to common neuraxial techniques such as paravertebral and epidural injections, the ESPB targets an interfascial plane which is far from the spinal cord, root, and pleura. First applied to thoracic neuropathic pain, currently ESPB is being applied to postoperative pain control and includes variable clinical situations. In the abdomen and thoracic wall, thoracic ESPB can be applied for pain control after cardiac surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and thoracotomy. Recently, favorable postoperative pain control after lumbar spinal or lower limb surgeries has been reported with lumbar ESPB. In addition, ESPB has also been used for chronic pain conditions in the upper and lower extremities. The final target area of ESPB of cervical, thoarcic, and lumbar regiona is transverse process. Once the needle contact the tip of the transverse process, local anesthetics is injected subsequentely. However, contacting the bony structure with the needle can generage procedure related pain. If ESPB can be performed without touching the transverse process, the satisfaction of patient would be increased. Actually, intertransverse ligament, which is visibe by ultrasound, is present between transverse process. Therefore, if local anesthetics is injected after targeting intertransverse ligament, same effect of pain relief with tarting of transverse process of ESPB is uncertain

Enrollment: 90 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 20 to 80 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• lumbar disc herniation
• lumbar foraminal stenosis
• lumbar central stenosis
• lumbar spondylolisthesis
• numerical rating scale > 4
• back pain functional scale < 45
• duration of pain > 1 mon
• patients who can fully understand all items described in back pain functional scale

Exclusion criteria

• Allergy to local anesthetics or contrast medium
• Pregnancy
• Spine deformity
• Prior history of lumbar spine surgery
• No previous lumbar MRI or CT
• Patients with coagulation abnormality

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

90 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

intertransverse ligagment group

Experimental group

Description:

lumbar ESPB was performed with final target at intertransverse ligament

Treatment:

Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block

transverse process group

Placebo Comparator group

Description:

lumbar ESPB was performed with final target at transverse process

Treatment:

Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block