Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
Irreversible electroporation is a local ablative technique used in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. In addition to its cytoreductive ability, IRE also induces a systemic immune response. However, this immune response is not potent enough to establish durable regression of the tumor. The immune response can be leveraged by combining IRE with immunotherapy. The primary aim of this study is to determine the safety of IRE + Nivolumab (arm B) and IRE + Nivolumab + CpG (arm C). The secondary aim is to assess efficacy of the experimental arms (B, C) and control arm A (Nivolumab monotherapy), based on overall and progression-free survival as well as locoregional and systemic immune modulation.
Full description
Pancreatic carcinoma is one of the deadliest types of cancer. In contrast to other cancers, new treatment options have demonstrated only moderate improvements for pancreatic cancer in terms of overall survival. Patients with metastasized disease (stage IV, AJCC) that are treated with chemotherapy in the Netherlands currently present a median overall survival of 6.4 months. Previous research has shown promising results for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC, stage III, AJCC) with regards to combination treatment with chemotherapy and irreversible electroporation (IRE), a local ablation technique that utilizes electrical pulses to destroy cancerous tissue. In addition to an increase in overall survival, IRE induced a systemic immune response. However, the immune response was not potent enough to generate a lasting anti-tumor effect. Leveraging the body's own immune response by using local and systemic immunotherapy may create a synergistic effect, potentially inducing a durable anti-tumor response. The PANFIRE-III is a prospective randomised phase 1 trial with the primary aim to determine safety of the combination therapies IRE + Nivolumab (arm B) and CpG + IRE + Nivolumab (arm C) in patients with oligo-metastasized pancreatic cancer. The secondary goal is to determine efficacy of the experimental arms (arm B, C) compared to the control arm A (Nivolumab monotherapy). This will be assessed by looking at the overall and progression-free survival as well as the locoregional and systemic immune response. The treatment combination of IRE with immunotherapy has the potential to generate systemic protection by in vivo vaccination against pancreatic cancer cells, hereby inhibiting both local and distant tumor growth.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Trans-mucosal tumor invasion into surrounding duodenum or stomach;
Active epilepsy (last convulsion < 5 years);
History of cardiac disease:
Known hypersensitivity to any oligodeoxynucleotides.
Compromised liver function defined as warning signs of portal hypertension, INR > 1,5 without use of anticoagulants, bilirubin > x 1.5 Upper limit of normal range (ULN) ASAT >3.0 x ULN, ALAT >3.0 x ULN.
Compromised kidney function defined as eGFR <30 ml/min (using the Cockcroft Gault formula);
Active autoimmune disease requiring disease-modifying therapy at the time of screening: i.e. > 10 mg prednisolone per day or equivalent to this regimen.
Uncontrolled hypertension. Blood pressure must be ≤160/95 mmHg at the time of screening on a stable antihypertensive regimen;
Uncontrolled infections (> grade 2 NCI-CTC version 3.0); requiring antibiotics
Pregnant or breast-feeding subjects; Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed within 7 days of the start of treatment;
Immunotherapy prior to the procedure for the treatment of cancer;
Previous surgical therapy for pancreatic cancer;
Second primary malignancy with median 5 year OS < 90%, this excludes adequately treated cancers like: non-melanoma skin cancer, in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri, superficial bladder cancer or other malignancies treated previously without signs of recurrence.
Allergy to contrast agent.
Allergy to PET tracers 18F-FDG and 18F-BMS-986192 Zr-89-Nivolumab
Any implanted stimulation device;
Portal vein or VMS stenosis > 70% (relative contra-indication)
Any condition that is unstable or that could jeopardize the safety of the subject and their compliance in the study.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
18 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Bart Geboers, MD; Florentine EF Timmer, MSc
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal