Panobinostat Maintenance After HSCT fo High-risk AML and MDS

Goethe University

Status and phase: Terminated; Phase 3

Conditions: Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML); Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Treatments: Drug: Panobinostat

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04326764

ETAL-4 / HOVON-145

Details and patient eligibility

About

Aim of this prospective randomized trial is to compare maintenance treatment with panobinostat interspersed with donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) versus the standard approach of pre-emptive DLI alone in patients with poor-risk AML/MDS having favorably received an allogeneic HSCT followed by engraftment, donor chimerism and hematopoietic reconstitution.

Full description

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been shown to improve the outcome of poor-risk AML and MDS in both younger and older patients. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen have partially abrogated the problem of regimen-related toxicity. However, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains a major cause of non-relapse morbidity and mortality. Despite a strong graft versus leukemia (GvL) effect after allogeneic HSCT, the relapse rate after transplantation in poor-risk leukemia patients is still too high, necessitating new approaches to exploit GvL in a more optimized way. In addition, minimizing the GvHD reaction remains an important goal. One attractive strategy may be the administration of epigenetic therapy early after HSCT in order to optimize the GvL effect, to provide a direct anti-leukemic effect, and to control GvHD. Two preceding phase I/II studies have suggested that post-transplant administration of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor panobinostat may be associated with a reduced relapse rate, while allowing for control of GvHD. Based on these two studies, the hypothesis of the present trial is that panobinostat can be an effective drug in preventing relapse by optimizing GvL in MDS and AML patients with high-risk features after HSCT, while at the same time reducing GvHD. It has been designed to test this hypothesis in a prospective randomized trial comparing maintenance with panobinostat interspersed with donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) versus the standard approach of pre-emptive DLI alone in patients with poor-risk AML/MDS having favorably received an allogeneic HSCT followed by engraftment, donor chimerism and hematopoietic reconstitution.

Enrollment: 52 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 70 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adult patients (18-70 years of age)

• AML (except acute promyelocytic leukemia with PML-RARA and AML with BCR-ABL1) according to WHO 2016 classification with high-risk features defined as one or more of the following criteria:

  • refractory to or relapsed after at least one cycle of standard chemotherapy
  • > 10% bone marrow blasts at day 14-21 of the first induction cycle
  • adverse risk according to ELN 2017 risk stratification by genetics (Appendix 2) regardless of stage
  • secondary to MDS or radio-/chemotherapy
  • MRD positive before HSCT based on flow cytometry or PCR

or

• MDS with excess blasts (MDS-EB) according to the WHO 2016 classification, or high-risk or very high-risk according to IPSS-R

and

First allogeneic HSCT scheduled within the next 4-6 weeks using one of the following donors, conditioning regimens and strategies for GvHD prophylaxis:

1. Matched sibling or matched unrelated donor (i.e. 10/10 or 9/10 HLA-matched) or haploidentical family donor

2. Conditioning regimens:

   1. Reduced-intensity conditioning:

a. Fludarabine/Melphalan b. Fludarabine/Busulfan2 (FB2) (2) Myeloablative conditioning:

1. Fludarabine/Busulfan4 (FB4)
2. Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (BU/CY)
3. Fludarabine/TBI 8 Gy
4. Cyclophosphamide/TBI 12 Gy (3) Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide/TBI 2 Gy in combination with post-Tx cyclophosphamide (TP-CY) only (4) Thiotepa/Busulfan/Fludarabine (TBF) in the context of an haploidentical HSCT only (5) In case of active disease at HSCT, salvage chemotherapy prior to conditioning is permitted

c. Strategies for GvHD prophylaxis:

1. HLA-matched donors:

   a. CSA + MMF +/- ATG b. CSA + MTX +/- ATG c. PT-CY + CSA

2. Haploidentical donors:

   d. PT-CY + CSA + MMF

   • No history of significant cardiac disease and absence of active symptoms, otherwise documented left ventricular EF ≥ 40%

   • Written informed consent for registration

   Exclusion Criteria:

   • Prior treatment with a DAC inhibitor

   • Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients of panobinostat

   • HIV or HCV antibody positive
   • Psychiatric disorder that interferes with ability to understand the study and give informed consent, and/or impacts study participation or follow-up.
   • Female patients who are pregnant or breast feeding
   • History of another primary malignancy that is currently clinically significant or currently requires active intervention

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

52 participants in 2 patient groups

Panobinostat

Experimental group

Description:

Panobinostat 20 mg oral three times weekly every second week

Treatment:

Drug: Panobinostat

Standard of Care

No Intervention group

Description:

Treatment according to local standards