Panther: A Study Comparing Biweekly and Tailored EC-T Versus Three Weekly FEC-T in Breast Cancer Patients (PANTHER)

Karolinska University Hospital

Status and phase: Active, not recruiting; Phase 3

Conditions: Breast Cancer

Treatments: Drug: FEC→T; Drug: dtEC→dtT

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other; NETWORK

Identifiers

NCT00798070

ISRCTN39017665 (Registry Identifier)

PANTHER SBG2004-1

ABCSG25 (Other Identifier)

GBG53 (Other Identifier)

2007-002061-12 (EudraCT Number)

Details and patient eligibility

About

This is an adjuvant, open, prospective, randomized study to compare:

A. Individually tailored and two weekly dosed epirubicin + cyclophosphamide followed by a three weeks break followed by biweekly and tailored docetaxel (dtEC→dtT) given every second week, to

B. Fixed dosed and three weekly epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil, followed by fixed dosed and three weekly docetaxel (FEC→T).

Patients with primary node-positive or high risk lymph node negative breast cancer will be eligible for the study.

The primary objective of the phase 3 study is to compare breast cancer relapse-free survival (BCRFS) between the dtEC→dtT and FE100C→T. To detect a five-year BCRFS difference of 0.710 to 0.790 about 1000 patients per arm will be needed. They will be recruited during four years and followed another two years for breast cancer events.

Secondary objectives are to compare

1. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS)

2. Event-free survival and

3. Overall survival

4. Health-related quality of life and toxicity analyses according to CTC

5. Outcome in relation to tumour biological factors and polymorphism patterns

   1. RFS in relation to the Sorlie classes using immunohistochemical markers and/or gene expression profiling comparing A vs B arm
   2. RFS with receptor positive disease (analyzed in the local laboratories as described in the CRFs and also analyzed as continuous variables) in the comparison between the A- and B- arms.
   3. RFS with high and low proliferation, respectively, (analyzed in the local laboratories as described in the CRFs and also analyzed as a continuous variable, or centrally analyzed), in the comparison between the A- and B-arms.
   4. RFS in relation to HER-2/neu status (analyzed in the local laboratories as described in the CRFs) in the primary cancers in the comparison between the A- and B-arms and analyzed whether trastuzumab was given in sequence or concurrently.
   5. RFS analyzed in relation to other molecular markers (e.g. gene expression profiling/ sequencing) in the primary cancers and SNPs signatures in normal DNA (related to toxicities for EC/FEC and docetaxel components, respectively, and given dose levels and outcome in relation to these factors and in relation QoL) to outcome per arm.
   6. RFS analyzed in relation to tumour associated lymphocytes and Y-box binding protein in the comparison between the A- and B-arms.

Tumour tissue will be obtained and stored for studies of prognostication and therapy prediction.

Last patient randomized was September 2011.

Full description

Are described under the heading "Outcome measures"

Enrollment: 2,017 patients

Sex: Female

Ages: 18 to 65 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Histological proven invasive primary breast cancer, with at least 5 (recommended 10) removed axillary lymph nodes OR negative sentinel node biopsy performed for the node negative cohort. Interval between definitive surgery that includes axillary lymph node dissection and registration must be less than 60 days. Paraffin block from the primary tumour must be retained (not mandatory for Austrian sites). Frozen tumour tissue is strongly recommended to be stored.
• Receptor negative or positive tumours with 1 or more positive axillary lymph nodes (more than 0.2 mm) OR axillary node negative breast cancers if the primary tumour is larger than 20 mm and receptor negative (Er and Pgr with no receptor content) and being Elston grade III. In Germany high risk node negative breast cancer patients are not eligible until labelling for docetaxel includes node-negative disease.
• A primary breast cancer patient being 35 years or younger considered suitable for adjuvant chemotherapy (may be receptor negative or positive, HER-2/neu negative or positive, with or without axillary lymph node metastases).
• Macroscopically and microscopically free margins after radical surgery (no cancer cells at borders of resection).
• No proven distant metastases (negative chest/pulmonary X-ray, bone scintigram (when clinical signs of skeletal metastases or elevated ALP) supplemented with normal conventional X-ray of hot spots, normal liver function test and haematological function tests; when abnormal values, CT or ultrasound of the liver, patient can be included if no metastases are demonstrated.
• Female age 18-65.
• Ambulant patients (ECOG 1 or less).
• No major cardiovascular morbidity NYHA I or II. (Appendix 3).
• Written informed consent according to the local ethics committee requirements.
• Patients of childbearing potential should have a negative pregnancy test within seven days of registration. (In Austria, pregnancy tests have to be repeated monthly during the treatment phase).

Exclusion criteria

• Previous neo-adjuvant treatment.
• Non-radical surgery (histopathological positive margins).
• Proven distant metastases.
• Pregnancy or lactation.
• Other serious medical condition.
• Previous or concurrent malignancies at other sites, except basal cell carcinoma and/or squamous cell carcinoma in situ of the skin or cervix. Patients with previous breast cancer (invasive and/or ductal carcinoma in situ) in the other breast without loco-regional (large lung volumes) radiotherapy, without objective findings for relapse, with > 5 years since diagnosis can be included.
• Abnormal laboratory values precluding the possibility to safely deliver the used cytotoxic agents in the study.
• Hypersensitivity to drugs formulated in polysorbate 80.
• Peripheral neuropathy grade ≥2.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

2,017 participants in 2 patient groups

Arm A: dtEC→dtT

Experimental group

Description:

Individually tailored and two weekly dosed epirubicin + cyclophosphamide followed by a three weeks break followed by biweekly and tailored docetaxel (dtEC→dtT) given every second week

Treatment:

Drug: dtEC→dtT

Arm B: FEC→T

Active Comparator group

Description:

Fixed dosed and three weekly epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil, followed by fixed dosed and three weekly docetaxel

Treatment:

Drug: FEC→T