Participant Satisfaction With Two Different Summative Assessment Methods - a Mixed Method Questionnaire Study

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Status: Completed

Conditions: Assessment Evaluation

Treatments: Other: different assessments

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03381443

ILS_assessment_2017/2018

Details and patient eligibility

About

Participants of Immediate Life Support and Advanced Life Support Courses, where two different summative assessment methods were used are asked about their satisfaction with the assessment method using a questionnaire. Both quantitative questions using an 11-point-Likert scale as well as open-ended qualitative questions will be asked. The primary aim of this study is to find out which variant of summative assessment is perceived by course participants as testing their leadership competency best, immediately after the comparison as well as 1 year later to identify any long-term effects on the students.

Enrollment: 428 patients

Sex: All

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• All 5th and 6th year medical students at the University of Bern, Switzerland, study year 2017/2018 and 2018/2019

Exclusion criteria

• Refusal to participate

Trial design

428 participants in 2 patient groups

ERC

Description:

all students assessed by the methods used by the European Resuscitation Council

Treatment:

Other: different assessments

AHA

Description:

all students assessed by the methods used by the American Heart Association

Treatment:

Other: different assessments