Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this research is to compare the benefits and risks of three anxiety treatments that are pragmatic, graduated in the level of resource intensity, and have demonstrated efficacy and feasibility for real world adoption.
Full description
The goal of this research is to compare the benefits and risks of three anxiety treatments that are pragmatic, graduated in the level of resource intensity, and have demonstrated efficacy and feasibility for real world adoption. Low-risk (non-cardiac) chest pain patients with anxiety will be recruited to participate in the study using the SBIRT (screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment) model and enrolled participants will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment arms: 1) referral to primary care with enhanced care coordinated (low intensity); 2) online CBT with support from a certified peer recovery specialist (medium intensity); and 3) therapist-led CBT via tele-health (high intensity). We expect improved symptoms and functional capacity, reduced ED return visits, and heterogenous treatment effects.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
375 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal