Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose is to study a model of mental health navigation for African American and Latinx children (0-14 years) in high poverty urban communities focused on reducing key parental attitudinal barriers to care. Reducing persistent racial and ethnic disparities in children's mental health is a national priority and patient navigation is a highly promising approach that is rarely used in children's mental health services. The study will examine the effectiveness of paraprofessional (PP) navigators who have strong community knowledge and waitlist as usual condition (active wailt list [AWL]. The study will examine specific mechanisms of navigator effectiveness in children's mental health and compare an AWL to provide a rigorous test of the proposed mechanisms. The knowledge gained from this application may be important to reducing disparities and employing the workforce best suited to navigation in the community mental health system. Two community boards, one focused on identifying factors important to supporting navigators at the agencies (Implementation and Sustainability Community Board) will meet quarterly, and the other focused on implications for state and federal policy (Public Policy Board), will meet annually.
Full description
Navigation to promote entry into health services, originally developed to address racia disparities in cancer screening and treatment, is only recently gaining prominence in mental health. Recent reviews recommend navigation for many health-related services including mental health services for transition-age youth and for children with medical complexity and comorbid mental health disorders. Logistical barriers are common across the health care system. However, for mental health services, stigma is also a prominent barrier. Paraprofessionals (PPs) have been key in efforts to reduce disparities in access to social services both nationally and internationally, presumably because their similarities to families can facilitate families' access to and retention in mental health services given their ability to relate to families' struggles. In this study, the investigators will examine paraprofessionals' (PP's) effectiveness as navigators for children's behavioral health services as compared to an active waitlist (AWL). For this study, AWL involves periodic check-ins by community agency intake staff with waitlist families to inquire about continued interest in services and provide resources as needed. For navigation, key elements of engagement and family support will be provided through in-person and virtual trainings including role play and feedback.
Specific aims are to examine:
The investigators will examine these hypotheses using an explanatory sequential mixed method design. Multi-level and longitudinal quantitative data will include information on (1) initial and ongoing use of services assessed via agency electronic medical record (EMR) data; (2) the type and rate of navigator services to families as assessed via EMR data and parent report of navigator endorsement of recommended services; (3) caregiver attitudes and services received, assessed through caregiver report; (4) integration of navigator into caregiver social support network assessed via caregiver report of a social support network; and (5) child and caregiver outcomes as assessed by the caregiver and therapist report collected during 6-month intervals up to 18 months post intake (baseline).
Quantitative data will be analyzed by generalized estimating equations models (GEE) accounting for the clustering effect of agencies and navigators and adjusted for covariates.
Qualitative analysis of independent interviews with PPs and caregivers will be conducted to contextualize and clarify the quantitative findings.
Two community boards will provide an opportunity for inter-agency communication and support by sharing challenges and successes and providing insights into local and national policy. An Implementation and Sustainability Community Board will meet quarterly to address issues of fit within each organization and consistency with local system procedures, and a Public Policy Board will meet annually to consider how the research can inform local and national mental health policy
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
154 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Tara G Mehta, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal