ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Patient-related Outcomes When Accelerating Upper Canine Retraction With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances

D

Damascus University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Treatments

Device: Electric stimulation removable appliance
Procedure: Traditional orthodontic fixed appliance without accleration

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06875037
UDDS-Ortho-4-2025

Details and patient eligibility

About

Patients will be screened in the Orthodontics Department of the Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, and those who meet the inclusion criteria will be included. Then, the initial diagnostic records (diagnostic plaster casts, intra- and extra-oral photographs, and radiographs) will be studied to ensure the selection criteria are accurately met.

This study aims to compare two groups of patients with Class II malocclusion. Experimental Group: Patients in this group will undergo maxillary canine retraction using the traditional sliding technique with fixed appliances, supplemented by electrical current stimulation.

Control Group: Patients in this group will undergo maxillary canine retraction using the traditional sliding technique with fixed appliances, without any acceleration method.

Full description

Maxillary canine retraction can be lengthy, and various methods have been employed to accelerate it. Electrical current stimulation has shown promise as a technique for speeding up tooth movement. However, only a limited number of studies have been documented in the literature. Controlled clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of this procedure in accelerating tooth movement, its impact on pain responses, and other patient-centred outcomes.

Participants will be selected from patients attending the Orthodontics Department at the Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University. Eligible patients with Class II/Division I malocclusion who meet the inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in this trial after being screened by the researcher. Informed consent will be obtained from all patients who agree to join the study after receiving an information sheet.

Alignment and leveling will be performed using pre-adjusted fixed orthodontic appliances consisting of 0.022 x 0.028-inch metal brackets with the MBT prescription. The traditional wiring sequence will be followed until a 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel base wire is in place.

Maxillary first premolars will be extracted during the leveling and alignment phase, with more than two months between the completion of the alignment phase and the extraction. This ensures that the phenomenon of regional acceleration generated by the extraction does not affect the rate of tooth movement.

Canine retraction will be achieved using closed-coil nickel-titanium (NiTi) springs extending from the upper first molar band hook to the canine bracket hook. A force of 150 grams will be applied to each side, and the force will be checked using a force meter at each appointment (every two weeks) until the canine retraction is complete, achieving a Class I canine relationship.

A small electrical current will be applied to the upper maxillary canine area using a removable intraoral appliance containing a micro electrical circuit. Each patient in the experimental group will be asked to wear the electrical accelerator in their mouth for 5 hours daily.

Enrollment

40 patients

Sex

All

Ages

17 to 25 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 17 to 28 years.
  • Class II Division 1 malocclusion (according to Angle's classification) requires the extraction of the upper first premolar as part of the orthodontic treatment plan.
  • Mild to moderate skeletal Class II (ANB = 5-7).
  • Overjet of 5 to 10 mm.
  • Normal or vertical growth patterns (MM ≥ 26; SN-MP ≥ 33; Y Axis ≥ 65)

Exclusion criteria

  • Moderate to severe dental crowding.
  • Missing teeth in the upper arch.
  • Previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Health conditions or long-term medication.
  • Periodontal disease.
  • Poor oral hygiene.
  • Smoking

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

40 participants in 2 patient groups

Electrical Stimulation Group
Experimental group
Description:
Patients in this group will undergo conventional orthodontic treatment combined with electrical stimulation for the retraction of upper canines.
Treatment:
Device: Electric stimulation removable appliance
Conventional Traction Group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients in this group will receive conventional orthodontic treatment without any acceleration method.
Treatment:
Procedure: Traditional orthodontic fixed appliance without accleration

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems