Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Using VISTA Technique Compared to MCAF Technique With PRF.

Cairo University (CU)

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Gingival Recession

Treatments: Procedure: modified coronally advanced flap; Procedure: VISTA Technique

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03328442

CEBD-CU-2017-10-30

Details and patient eligibility

About

VISTA technique with PRF compared to MCAF technique with PRF to treat gingival recession

Full description

Comparison between two techniques for root coverage divided in two groups the first (test group) VISTA technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane and the second (control group)MCAF technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane for treating Miller's class I and II gingival recession defects.

Clinical Periodontal Records will be taken at baseline, 3 months and 6 months respectively.

Visual analogue scale for pain during one week after operation. Patient satisfaction record using questionnaire after 6 months.

Enrollment: 16 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 55 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Age (18-55) Miller's classI and II multiple GR width of KG>2 mm

Exclusion criteria

• Systemic diseases Poor oral hygiene Smoking Patient allergy Miller's class III and IV

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Quadruple Blind

---

16 participants in 2 patient groups

Vista technique

Experimental group

Description:

The vista technique with PRF membrane uses a Vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access in combination with Platelet rich fibrin membrane to treat gingival recession defects.

Treatment:

Procedure: VISTA Technique

modified coronally advanced flap

Active Comparator group

Description:

A modified coronally advanced flap utilising Platelet rich fibrin membrane to treat gingival recession defects.

Treatment:

Procedure: modified coronally advanced flap