ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

PEEK Versus Metallic Attachment-retained Obturators

Cairo University (CU) logo

Cairo University (CU)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Maxillary Neoplasms

Treatments

Other: conventional obturator
Other: metalic attachment retained obturator
Other: PEEK attachment retained obturator

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04778254
38/10/2018

Details and patient eligibility

About

Patients' satisfaction evaluation and radiographic evaluation of the terminal abutments of attachment- retained maxillary obturators with metal framework versus milled PEEK framework in the management of maxillectomy cases.

Full description

Eighteen participants were randomly divided into three parallel groups (n=6). Participants of PEEK group received attachment-retained obturators with milled PEEK framework, metal group received an attachment-retained obturator with metallic framework and conventional group received conventional clasp-retained obturators with metallic framework (Control group). Evaluation included radiographic evaluation and patients' satisfaction where two scales were followed in this study, including "The Obturator Functioning Scale" and "The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck 35" using one way ANOVA test.

Enrollment

18 patients

Sex

All

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • patient underwent surgical removal of half of maxilla
  • participants with a sufficient number of natural teeth(class I and \or class IV Aramany classification) not less than 5 teeth, mouth opening is not less than 25 mm, intact soft palate,

Exclusion criteria

  • participants are exposed to radiotherapy or chemotherapy during last year.
  • participant with congenital defect

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

18 participants in 3 patient groups

conventional obturator
Active Comparator group
Description:
conventional group received conventional clasp-retained obturators with metallic framework (Control group).
Treatment:
Other: conventional obturator
metallic attachment retained obturator
Experimental group
Description:
metal group received an attachment-retained obturator with metallic framework
Treatment:
Other: metalic attachment retained obturator
PEEk attachment retained obturator
Experimental group
Description:
PEEK group received attachment-retained obturators with milled PEEK framework,
Treatment:
Other: PEEK attachment retained obturator

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems