ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

PEEP-induced Effects on Respiratory dRivE and EFfort (REEF)

R

Radboud University Medical Center

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

ARDS (Moderate or Severe)
Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Treatments

Other: PEEP level changes

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07203781
NL-009995

Details and patient eligibility

About

Rationale:

In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), preserving spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation offers physiological benefits, but also carries risks. While spontaneous breathing improves gas exchange and limits diaphragm atrophy, strong inspiratory efforts may worsen lung and diaphragm injury. Balancing these factors requires refined and tailored strategies, such as the modulation of PEEP. However, the impact of PEEP on neural respiratory drive and inspiratory effort is very heterogenous, and these two entities have only been studied separately in limited subsets of patients and healthy subjects. Additionally, it remains unclear whether the major determinant of PEEP-induced changes in respiratory drive and effort is represented by variations in diaphragm geometry, lung compliance, or by the presence of expiratory muscles recruitment, which may counteract its effect.

Objective:

The primary objective is to determine the effect of PEEP on diaphragm neuromechanical efficiency (i.e. an index of neural respiratory drive and inspiratory effort) in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure during invasive assisted mechanical ventilation. The secondary objective is to determine the major physiological contributors to PEEP-mediated changes in diaphragm neuromechanical efficiency.

Study design: Prospective, physiological study. Study population: Invasively mechanically ventilated adult patients admitted to the ICU.

Intervention:

For each patient, six different PEEP levels (15-12-10-8-5-2 cmH2O) will be tested during a decremental PEEP trial. During each step, neural respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, expiratory muscle activity, lung inflation pattern through electrical impedance tomography, respiratory muscle geometry and function through ultrasound and surface EMG, gas exchange and hemodynamics data will be collected.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

The primary outcome of the study will be the evaluation of PEEP-mediated changes in diaphragm neuromechanical efficiency (NME).

Enrollment

20 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) with a PaO2/FiO2-ratio ≤ 200
  • Patient on invasive assisted mechanical ventilation in pressure support mode exhibiting valid inspiratory efforts (occlusion pressure > 5 cmH2O).

Exclusion criteria

  • Pre-existent neuromuscular disease
  • History of chronic respiratory failure requiring long-term oxygen therapy
  • Muscle paralysis
  • Pneumothorax
  • Contra-indication to EIT monitoring (e.g. burns, pacemaker, thoracic wounds limiting electrode placement)
  • Contra-indications for EAdi or oesophageal balloon catheter placement (e.g. history of gastric bypass surgery, gastro-oesophageal junction surgery, oesophageal stricture, recent upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage or known/suspected varices).

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

20 participants in 1 patient group

Single arm
Experimental group
Treatment:
Other: PEEP level changes

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Tommaso Rosà, M.D.

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems