Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The main goal of this study is to tests the effect of incentivizing achievement of self-identified, personal harm reduction goals (Contingency management or CM) compared with standard of care (peer harm reduction service with incentives for peer visits) to increase the reach and effectiveness of methamphetamine (MA) harm reduction services.
Full description
Using a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation framework and stepped-wedge design, this study will randomize eighteen community-based peer harm reduction sites to provide contingency management incentives for achieving self-identified harm reduction goals set with peer specialists using a participant-driven harm reduction goal-setting process (e.g. completing overdose prevention and supply training, daily life goals, treatment and care goals, relationship and social support goals) versus standard of care contingency management (i.e. incentives for peer encounter attendance).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
This intervention is at the site level. Community-based organization sites are eligible if they:
Clients who:
Exclusion criteria
Community-based organization sites who:
Clients who:
• Present any danger or threat of violence to peers
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
1,283 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Todd Korthuis, MD, MPH; Sara McCrimmon, MPH
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal