ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Performance Comparison of Two Monthly Replacement Silicone Hydrogel Multifocal Lens Types

C

CooperVision International Limited (CVIL)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Presbyopia

Treatments

Device: Test Lens (lehfilcon A)
Device: Control Lens (comfilcon A)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

NCT06232590
EX-MKTG-153

Details and patient eligibility

About

To evaluate and compare the performance of two monthly replacement multifocal contact lenses in existing wearers.

Full description

This was a prospective, randomized, participant-masked, crossover, bilateral dispensing study. Each lens type was worn for approximately 4-6 weeks: the lens prescription of each lens type was optimized after 3-10 days wearing experience, prior to starting a 1-month (28-32 days) wear period.

Enrollment

60 patients

Sex

All

Ages

42+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Were at least 42 years of age and had full legal capacity to volunteer;

  2. Had read and signed an information consent letter;

  3. Self-reported having had a full eye examination in the previous two years;

  4. Anticipated being able to wear the study lenses for at least 8 hours a day, 5 days a week;

  5. Were willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule;

  6. Habitually wore spherical multifocal soft contact lenses, for the past 3 months minimum:

    • Maximum of 4 participants (out of 12) per site could be habitual wearers of daily disposable lenses,
    • Maximum of 4 participants (out of 12) per site could be habitual wearers of Biofinity Multifocal,
    • Maximum of 4 participants (out of 12) per site could be habitual wearers of either TOTAL30 Multifocal or AirOptix plus HydraGlyde Multifocal
  7. Had refractive astigmatism no higher than -0.75DC;

  8. Is presbyopic and requires a reading addition of at least +0.75D and no more than +2.50D;

  9. Could be fit and achieve binocular distance vision of at least 20/30 Snellen which participants also deem to be 'acceptable', with the available study lens parameters (Distance sphere +4 to -6; near addition as per study design).

Exclusion criteria

  1. Were participating in any concurrent clinical or research study;
  2. Had any known active ocular disease and/or infection that contraindicated contact lens wear;
  3. Had a systemic or ocular condition that in the opinion of the investigator may have affected a study outcome variable;
  4. Were using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may have affect contact lens wear or a study outcome variable;
  5. Had known sensitivity to the diagnostic sodium fluorescein used in the study;
  6. Self-reported as pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment;
  7. Had undergone refractive error surgery or intraocular surgery.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

60 participants in 2 patient groups

Control Lens, then Test Lens
Experimental group
Description:
Participants wore Control Lens for 1 month, then the Test Lens for 1 month
Treatment:
Device: Control Lens (comfilcon A)
Device: Test Lens (lehfilcon A)
Test Lens, then Control Lens
Experimental group
Description:
Participants wore the Test Lens for 1 month, then the Control Lens for 1 month
Treatment:
Device: Control Lens (comfilcon A)
Device: Test Lens (lehfilcon A)

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

5

Loading...

Central trial contact

José A Vega, OD PhD FAAO

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems