Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this randomized, controlled crossover study was to assess the performance of a new micro-hole zone catheter compared to a conventional 2-eyelet catheter in 42 male intermittent catheter users.
The main objective of this study was to demonstrate superiority of the micro-hole zone catheter in terms of number of flow-stop episodes and residual volume at first flow-stop, with the catheterization performed by a health care professional in a hospital setting compared to a conventional two-eyelet catheter.
Full description
The investigation was a single-centre, randomized, controlled crossover study including 42 male participants comparing the performance of two intermittent catheters (IC).
The study included an information visit (visit 0) and two test visits (visit 1 and 2) in which one catheterization with either the investigational device or the comparator device, according to a randomization scheme, was performed by a health care professional in a hospital setting assessing flow stop episodes, bladder emptying and hematuria. There were 4-14 days between each test visit (visit 1 and 2) and visit 0 and 1 could be held on the same day.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Is participating in any other clinical study during this investigation
Has previous participated in this study
Has symptoms of urinary tract infection as judged by the investigator 4 Is an individual with history, suspected or showing signs of producing urine with excessive amount of mucus or large/clustered sediments or debris
Has any known allergies towards ingredients in the investigational device
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
42 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal