ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Performance of MicroTextured Dental Implants

The University of Alabama at Birmingham logo

The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Status

Completed

Conditions

Partially Edentulous Jaw

Treatments

Device: Microtextured dental implant treatment
Device: Dental implant treatment

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The study will compare initial peri-implant bone healing and longitudinal osseointegration between a fully microtextured dental implant and an analogous implant with a smooth machined collar.

The investigators hypothesize the fully textured implant will result in less peri-implant crestal bone resorption than the implant with a machined collar.

Full description

Zimmer dental has developed a microtextured tapered screw-vent implant design with a titanium skin that has been grit-blasted with hydroxyapatite particles resulting in an overall roughened surface, which, when compared to an implant with a machined (smooth) collar (narrow band around the top of the device) surface is thought to increase the apposition of osseous tissue integration and to promote epithelial attachment to the implant device.

Enrollment

68 patients

Sex

All

Ages

19+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Be a current registered University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB)dental school patient
  2. Existence of one or more missing teeth scheduled to be replaced with dental implants
  3. Healthy enough to undergo proposed therapy without compromising existing health
  4. Able to consent for their own inclusion
  5. Able to read and understand the informed consent form
  6. Demonstrated willingness to comply with protocol requirements and timeline

Exclusion criteria

  1. Any health condition that in the opinion of the investigators may adversely affect bone healing
  2. Any medication that in the opinion of the investigators may adversely affect bone healing
  3. Any indication of an inability to make autonomous decisions
  4. Reported pregnancy at the time of enrollment -

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

68 participants in 2 patient groups

Microtextured dental implant
Experimental group
Description:
Randomized for microtextured dental implant treatment
Treatment:
Device: Microtextured dental implant treatment
Dental implant
Active Comparator group
Description:
Randomized dental implant treatment with machined-collar implants
Treatment:
Device: Dental implant treatment

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems