ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Peri-implant Papillary Height Comparison in Microsurgically and Macrosurgically Placed Dental Implants

K

Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Dental Implants

Treatments

Procedure: dental implant placement using magnifying loupes and microsurgical instruments
Procedure: macrosurgical dental implant placement

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04189328
02_D012_82168

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study compares the peri-implant soft tissue and crestal bone loss around single implants when placed macrosurgically and microsurgically.

Full description

Black triangles in dentition especially in the anterior teeth would pose an esthetic concern. Interdental papilla height is crucial for eliminating this black triangle.

32 participants, 16 in two groups were assigned randomly. Microsurgical approach using microsurgical instruments and magnifying loupes were used for one group participants and similar procedure without magnifying loupes and microsurgical instruments was done in the other group.

comparsion of the microsurgical outcome is done by measuring peri implant papilla gain and radiographic crestal bone loss will be done between the groups.

Enrollment

20 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients desiring implant placement for replacement of missing tooth and willing to participate in the study

    • Non smokers
    • Patients who do not report any relevant medically comprimising conditions or had not received any radiation therapy in head and neck region for cancer therapy.
    • Subjects with satisfactory residual ridges who demonstrated adequate bucco-lingual and mesio-distal space for implant placement, that facilitates primary stability.
    • Patients who demonstrate Plaque Index <10% and good compliance.
    • Full mouth bleeding scores ≤25% before the implant placement.
    • Sites with sufficient band of keratinised mucosa.

Exclusion criteria

  • • Pregnant and lactating females

    • Patients on anticancer therapy and immunosuppressant drugs.
    • Implants to be placed in sites with previous periodontal disease
    • Bleeding disorder or on anticoagulant therapy
    • Systemic diseases that would negatively influence wound healing

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

20 participants in 2 patient groups

control group
Active Comparator group
Description:
conventional macrosurgical implant placement
Treatment:
Procedure: macrosurgical dental implant placement
test group
Experimental group
Description:
microsurgical implant placement
Treatment:
Procedure: dental implant placement using magnifying loupes and microsurgical instruments

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems