Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
One of the major challenges one clinician can face while performing immediate placement on posterior area, is the ability of obtaining a hermetic primary closure of the soft tissue. The use of socket sealing abutment may provide advantages in maintaining the existing soft tissue architecture, preserving crestal bone height and reducing the risk of premature loading of the immediate implant during healing
Full description
One of the major challenges one clinician can face while performing immediate placement on posterior area, is the ability of obtaining a hermetic primary closure of the soft tissue. This technical skill is nearly always combined with invasive surgical procedures and significant post op recovery (displacement of the muco-gingival line, periosteal releasing incision, flaps, sutures, membrane stabilization, ...).the use of customized healing abutment may provide advantages in maintaining the existing soft tissue architecture, preserving crestal bone height and reducing the risk of premature loading of the immediate implant during healing.
Moreover, customized healing abutment can passively accommodate the definitive prosthesis with minimal or no pressure placement preventing biological or mechanical trauma during the prosthetic phases. This may lead to better long-term tissue stability and avoid the pain perceived by the patients from compression of tissues in case of standard healing abutment.
the primary aim of this randomized controlled clinical study is to clinically evaluate and compare the soft tissue outcomes of final immediate implant restorations placed in maxillary posterior sites that were conditioned by CAD/CAM fabricated socket sealing abutments versus standard healing abutments.
The secondary aim of this study is to radiographically assess peri-implant bone level changes of the final immediate implant restorations placed in maxillary posterior sites for the two experimental groups.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
The patients ≥18 years old. 2. Non-restorable maxillary posterior teeth with intact adjacent teeth. 3. Sufficient bone to insert a dental implant with a minimum length of 8 mm and at least 3.5 mm in diameter.
Type1 extraction socket according to Elian et al, 200742 (Labial bone plate and associated soft tissues are completely intact).
Sufficient mesio-distal, bucco-lingual, and inter-occlusal space for placement of the definite restoration.
Adequate oral hygiene (full mouth plaque score < 25% and full mouth bleeding score < 25%).
Patients capable of understanding and giving informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
20 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
mai elgendi, master
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal