Status
Conditions
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
Emergency General Surgery (EGS) is an umbrella term which describes all patients presenting to hospital with an acute abdominal problem. Patients can have various conditions requiring emergency operations. EGS is one of the most common reasons for an emergency admission in the UK.
EGS is often referred to as "high-risk" surgery. For those patients who do survive after their surgery, many struggle with frailty and new medical problems resulting in a reduction in their quality of life (QoL).
The goal of this observational study is to explore QoL and decision-making in EGS through questionnaires and interviews with patients, families/supporters and consultants working in EGS.
Workstream 1 will involve patients and families/supporters. Workstream 2 will involve consultants.
The investigators are interested in patients who have either undergone EGS (EmLaps) or have needed but not undergone EGS (NoLaps). The investigators are interested in exploring participants (patients, families/supporters and consultants) experiences of this EmLap vs NoLap decision.
The main questions the investigators want to answer are:
Workstream 1 participants (patients and family members/supporters) will complete questionnaires and take part in interviews at different time-points following their decision (1 month/3 months/ 9-12 months). Questionnaires and interviews will explore QoL and decision-making in EGS.
Consultant participants will be asked to complete an online survey and/or take part in an individual interview. Both will explore decision-making in EGS.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Group 1 and 2: EmLap and NoLap patients (up to 30 participants)
Patient inclusion/exclusion criteria should mirror NELA inclusion/exclusion criteria and NELA NoLap guidelines. NELA is the "National Emergency Laparotomy Audit" which recruits patients in Wales and England and there inclusion/exclusion criteria are widely accepted for use in Emergency General Surgery research.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Group 3: Families/Supporters (up to 30 participants) Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Group 3: Consultants (interview:12-20 participants/survey: minimum 52 participants) Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
• Consultants not done >2 years of on-call
112 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Rachel John-Charles, MBChB, Bsc (Hons), MRSC; Susan Moug, MBChB, Bsc (Hons), FRSC, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal