Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Retrospective reports from literature have shown a lower rate of infections for transperineal versus transrectal approach for prostate biopsies in the setting of prostate cancer suspicion.
The aim of this study would be to compare in a prospective randomized trial the rate of infection with transperineal versus transrectal approach.
Full description
Retrospective reports from literature have shown a lower rate of infections for the transperineal versus transrectal approach for prostate biopsies in the setting of prostate cancer suspicion.
Post-biopsy infection is becoming a more and more challenging situation due to the increase of incidence and development of antibiotic resistant germs.
The aim of this study would be to compare in a prospective randomized trial the rate of infection with transperineal vs transrectal approach.
Patient presenting an indication of prostate biopsy (PSA elevation, suspicious lesion at digital rectal, suspicious lesion on MRI) would be randomized 1:1 among transrectal vs transperineal biopsies.
Post-biopsy infection would be monitored by systemic urine analysis at one, two and four weeks after procedure and in case of clinical symptoms.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
340 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Alexandre INGELS, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal