ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Periodized Resistance and Aerobic Training in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Cairo University (CU) logo

Cairo University (CU)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Treatments

Behavioral: resistance training program

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06922981
periodized RT and AT in NSCLBP

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of two forms of periodized exercise training programs (resistance and aerobic ) using the best recommended parameters (volume, intensity, rest period, and frequency) on the best available outcome measures (pain, disability, fear of movement, back and abdominal muscular endurance, upper body strength (latissimus dorsi muscle),and lower body strength ( gluteus maximus )

Full description

Low back pain (LBP) is a significant health problem and the leading cause of disability throughout the world, representing one of the most common reasons for primary care physician visits, with a lifetime prevalence reported as high as about 80%. It causes a significant economic and social burden that will become even more daunting in the coming decades. People with LBP are 2.5 times more likely to experience psychological distress and pain compared to normal people, which can adversely affect quality of life. Low back pain is commonly classified as nonspecific or specific due to the reported cause and as acute (<6weeks), subacute (6-12 weeks), or chronic (>12weeks) according to the duration of symptoms. A periodized training model is considered more effective at improving the physiological function than non-periodized (basic progressive overload), as it allows progressive adjustment of volume and intensity of training program.periodization is defined as the planned manipulation of training variables (load, sets, and repetitions) in order to maximize training adaptations and to prevent the onset of overtraining syndrome. Various periodization models exist: undulating periodization comprises a frequent variation in stimuli between low, moderate, and high intensity typically on a weekly basis, whereas traditional linear periodization typically contains low load and high volume in the initial phase of training with a gradual shift towards high load and low volume as the training progresses. Periodization may also be beneficial due to adding variation to workouts by manipulating sets, repetitions, exercise order, number of exercises, resistance, rest periods, type of contractions, or training frequency. Another added benefit is the avoidance of training plateaus or boredom. Thus it seems reasonable to consider a periodized training model in the management of those with NSCLBP.

Enrollment

38 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 45 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female participants with nonspecific (nonspecific pathology) chronic (> 12 weeks) low back pain (localized below the costal margin and above the gluteal fold) (Owen et al., 2020).

    • Participants aged between 18 to 45 years (Wewege et al., 2018).
    • Participants with Body Mass Index (BMI) 18.5-29.9 Kg/m2.
    • VAS score 3-8 cm (Pieler-Bruha, 2009).
    • ODI score 10-60 (Pieler-Bruha, 2009).

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants will be excluded if they did not meet the inclusion criteria mentioned above such as pain due to or associated with:

    • Pregnancy
    • Infection
    • Fracture
    • Tumor
    • Structural deformity (e.g. scoliosis)
    • Radicular syndrome or cauda equine syndrome
    • Inflammatory disorders (Owen et al., 2020)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

38 participants in 2 patient groups

resistance group
Experimental group
Description:
Nineteen male and female patients aged 18 to 45 years, diagnosed with NSCLBP were recruited through referrals from orthopedic surgeons.The exercise program included upper and lower body resistance training exercises including leg press, lateral pull down, abdominal crunch, Swiss ball abdominal crunch, and prone superman exercises, utilizing free weights, machines, and bodyweight exercises. The therapist performed a one-repetition maximum (1 RM) test at baseline to determine the initial exercise loads. Participants then performed exercises at 50% to 70% of their 1 RM value. This process of periodic 1 RM testing and training at 50% to 70% of the value is repeated every two weeks till the end of the study.
Treatment:
Behavioral: resistance training program
aerobic group
Experimental group
Description:
Nineteen male and female patients aged 18 to 45 years, diagnosed with NSCLBP were recruited through referrals from orthopedic surgeons.The periodized aerobic training (AT) program consisted of three sessions per week. Each Exercise session consisted of a 5-minute warm-up, 30 minutes of aerobic exercise, and a 5-minute cool-down. Backward walking was performed on a motorized treadmill.The participants began with 10-15 minutes of exercise at 40-55% HRR (RPE=11-12, light) during the first two weeks, 20-30 minutes of exercise at 55-70% HRR (RPE=12-13, somewhat hard) during the third and fourth week, then 30 minutes of exercise at 70-85% HRR (RPE=14-16, hard) for the remainder of the study.
Treatment:
Behavioral: resistance training program

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems