Perioperative Δ9-THC for Postsurgical Pain (NamiSur)

Radboud University Medical Center

Status and phase: Unknown; Phase 2

Conditions: Pain

Treatments: Drug: Namisol; Drug: Diazepam/placebo

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT01790555

NL43115.091.13 (Other Identifier)

2012-005808-17 (EudraCT Number)

HEEL-2012-04

Details and patient eligibility

About

Adequate treatment of postsurgical pain leads to better mobilization, shorter hospital stay, lower costs and higher patient satisfaction. In its treatment, frequent use is made of opioids. However, opioids have many side-effects. A possible add-on can be sought in THC, which has been shown to have possible analgesic and/or pain modulating effects in preclinical research. The purpose of this study is to investigate the analgesic and pain modulating effects of perioperative Namisol, a tablet containing THC, in patients that will undergo major abdominal surgery.

Full description

Rationale: Early postsurgical pain is a consequence of tissue trauma during surgery, which can lead to hyperalgesia or allodynia. Adequate management of postsurgical pain leads to earlier mobilization, shortened hospital stay, reduced costs, and increased patient satisfaction. Treatment usually involves the use of opioids, which have many side effects. Besides the problem of acute surgical pain, surgery may lead to the development of persistent postsurgical pain.

Based on preclinical research, it is hypothesized that Δ9-THC may improve outcomes of early postsurgical pain due to pain modulatory effects and may lower the incidence of persistent postsurgical pain through modulation of central pain processing, e.g. reduction of central sensitization. From clinical studies, evidence for the value of Δ9-THC in this context is, to date, scarce. Indeed, research in a patient group with a major nociceptive load - i.e. major abdominal surgery - and an extended perioperative treatment schedule has not been performed so far. Both a major nociceptive load and an extended perioperative treatment schedule are necessary for adequate assessment of the analgesic efficacy of Δ9-THC in this context. Thus, the question regarding the perioperative analgesic efficacy of Δ9-THC in major abdominal surgery remains unresolved.

Objectives: The primary aim of this study is to investigate the analgesic effect of perioperatively administered Namisol® to reduce postsurgical pain on the day of major abdominal surgery and in the first five days after major abdominal surgery. A secondary aim is to investigate the effect of perioperatively administered Namisol® on the incidence of persistent postsurgical pain in the first 12 postoperative weeks.

Study design: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study design with an perioperative add-on treatment of Namisol or placebo and a follow-up period of 24 weeks.

Study population: Forty patients will be recruited from the outpatient clinic of the department of surgery of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center. Patients will have persistent or intermittent abdominal pain, due to underlying intra-abdominal pathology including diverticulitis, Crohn's disease, chronic pancreatitis, ulcerative colitis, endometriosis, or abdominal adhesions. Other intra-abdominal pathology may be included if causing pain and if judged appropriate by the investigator. Patients will be planned to undergo elective, open abdominal surgery with planned use of an epidural catheter for perioperative analgesia. The surgical procedure will have an estimated duration of at least two hours, excluding the time to induce anesthesia.

Intervention: Namisol®, a tablet with standardized Δ9-THC content, or identical matching placebos will be administered orally to evaluate the analgesic properties of Namisol® administered as add-on perioperative treatment. The study medication is given from the day before surgery (day -1: 5 mg in the afternoon and in the evening) up to the fifth day after surgery (day 0 to +5: 5 mg four times daily).

Primary and secondary study parameters: The primary study outcome is postsurgical pain intensity during the first five postoperative days, reflected by the primary endpoint: the area under the curve of the VAS scores in the first five days (AUC5days) after surgery. The secondary outcome is the incidence of persistent postsurgical pain 12 weeks after surgery.

Other study parameters: In addition to the primary and secondary outcomes, several other outcome parameters will be collected. These include measures of postsurgical pain intensity at 24 weeks after surgery, measures of analgesic efficacy (postoperative consumption of other analgesics), central nervous system processing and sensitization in the first 5 days and after 6 and 12 weeks after surgery (QST, Von Frey testing, and brush stroke testing), postoperative sedation level (Ramsay Scale), and immune system response during 72 hours after surgery and after 6 weeks (ILs, MMPs) are investigated. In addition, questionnaires are filled out to examine parameters related to side effects and postoperative recovery (VAS Bond&Lader, VAS Bowdle, HADS, SF-36, PCS, PASS, QoR-40, AppLe, and TSQM). Two variants in genetic CYP2C9 polymorphisms will be genotyped and three variants in genetic CYP2C19 polymorphisms will be genotyped.

Nature and extent of the burdens, risks, and benefits: Participation means three or four visits to the outpatient clinic in addition to usual care, including the screening visit. Various measurements, including blood samples (seven additional samples over the entire study period), will be conducted during each visit. The participating patients may experience better pain relief in the postoperative period and may benefit from a reduced incidence of persistent postsurgical pain, but are subject to more intense diagnostics and observation.

Enrollment: 40 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

• Patient is at least 18 years old on the day the informed consent form will be signed.
• Patient has persistent or intermittent abdominal pain due to underlying intra-abdominal pathology.
• If the patient uses concomitant analgesic medication the dosage intake is stable for at least two weeks prior to the day of screening. Stable dose intake is defined as a daily equivalent sum of intake according to medical prescription within a small deviation range as judged by the investigator.
• Patient is undergoing elective, open abdominal surgery with planned use of an epidural catheter. The surgical procedure has an estimated duration of at least two hours, excluding the time to induce anesthesia.
• Patient scores I to III in the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system (ASA I-III).
• Patient is willing and able to comply with the lifestyle guidelines, scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other trial procedures.
• Patient is able to speak, read and understand the local language of the investigational site, is familiar with the procedures of the study, and agrees to participate in the study program by giving oral and written informed consent prior to screening evaluations.

Exclusion criteria

• Patient is ineligible for the anesthesia protocol, as judged by the investigator.
• Patient is undergoing (abdominal wall) surgery with mesh implantation.
• Patient used any cannabinoids (by smoking cannabis or oral intake) for at least one month prior to the day of screening.
• Patient has (a history of) a medical disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the study or may pose a risk for the patient.
• Patient uses amitriptyline or other concomitant medication that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the study or may pose a risk for the patient.
• Patient demonstrates clinically significant deviations in the electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters at screening.
• Patient is at the moment of screening diagnosed with moderate to severe renal impairment as judged by the investigator.
• Patient is at the moment of screening diagnosed with moderate to severe hepatic failure as judged by the investigator.
• Patient has a presence or history of major psychiatric illness as judged by the investigator.
• Patient demonstrates clinically significant laboratory abnormalities that in the opinion of the investigator may increase the risk associated with trial participation or may interfere with the interpretation of the trial results.
• Patient has a history of sensitivity/idiosyncrasy to THC or diazepam, compounds related to these compounds, or to any other related drug used in the past.
• Patient demonstrates a positive urine drug screen at screening visit for THC, cocaine, MDMA, or amphetamines.
• Female patient intends to conceive a child, is pregnant or breastfeeding, or does not use acceptable birth control measures including oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices or mechanical methods during the course of the study.
• Patient participated in another investigational drug study within 90 days prior to the first dose and/or participated in more than 2 clinical trials in the last 365 days.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Quadruple Blind

---

40 participants in 2 patient groups

Namisol

Experimental group

Description:

The study medication is given from the day before surgery (day -1: 5 mg in the afternoon and in the evening) up to the fifth day after surgery (day 0 to +5: 5 mg four times daily).

Treatment:

Drug: Namisol

Diazepam/Placebo

Other group

Description:

The study medication is given from the day before surgery (day -1: 5 mg in the afternoon and in the evening) up to the fifth day after surgery (day 0 to +5: 5 mg four times daily). Before surgery, diazepam is used as an active comparator, to aid in blinding. After surgery, an inactive placebo is used as an inactive comparator.

Treatment:

Drug: Diazepam/placebo