Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The primary aim of this study is to determine if the insertion of a peripheral Internal Jugular (IJ) catheter is faster than a standard of care intravenous (IV)access in patients with difficult access. The secondary aims of this study examine patient discomfort between standard IV insertion vs. peripheral IV insertion as well as a comparison of complication rates between the two methods of insertion. Support for the peripheral IV procedure could provide an option for the thousands of Emergency Department (ED) patients who daily encounter the situation of difficult IV access and the numerous needle pokes that accompany it. Using this procedure may result in greater patient satisfaction and reduced complication rates.
Full description
This will be a randomized control trial comparing peripheral IJ to standard care of difficult access patients.
Catheters will be placed by attending physicians and residents (2nd and 3rd years) with experience placing ultrasound guided internal jugular central venous catheters. Because the procedure is identical to the first step of placing an IJ Central Venous Catheter, there is no special training needed for the procedure itself. A video will be created and viewed by all placing the catheters to show the specifics so that there is standardization between individuals.
Attempts to place the peripheral IJ will be limited to two. If not successful after two attempts, the patient will return to 'standard care' and the treatment team will decide on further directions such as ultrasound guided peripheral IV or central venous line.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
29 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal