ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Directed Oxygen Therapy (POSDOT)

H

Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Critical Illness

Treatments

Other: SpO2 directed oxygen therapy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02999932
WuhanUHICU201701

Details and patient eligibility

About

Investigators hypothesized that a relative low SpO2 directed oxygen therapy would reduced the mortality in patients staying longer than 72 hours in ICUs.

Full description

In fear of harmful effect of hypoxia, oxygen therapy is commonly used, especially in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). However, hyperoxia can be harmful too. Examples are myocardial infarction (MI) patients and patients resuscitated to return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest. In Air Versus Oxygen in Myocardial Infarction (AVOID) trial, Meyhoff and colleagues proved hyperoxia caused more cardiac injury in patients with ST-elevation MI but without hypoxia. Kilgannon and colleagues found that arterial hyperoxia following resuscitation from cardiac arrest were associated with increased in-hospital mortality, and a pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 94-98% was recommended.

Recently, Panwar and colleagues found that compared to liberal oxygen strategy (SpO2 ≥96%), conservative oxygen strategy (SpO2 of 88%-92%) was feasible in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. Girardis and colleagues found control oxygen therapy (targeting SpO2 of 94%-98% or PaO2 of 70-100mmHg) resulted lower ICU mortality than conventional oxygen therapy (SpO2 ≥97%) in the randomized clinical trial called Oxygen-ICU. However, the Oxygen-ICU trial was single-centered, early-terminated with only 480 patients included and led to an unplanned interim analysis. In this larger multicenter trial, investigators hypothesized that a relative low SpO2 directed oxygen therapy was safe and would reduced the 28-day mortality in patients staying longer than 72 hours in ICUs.

Enrollment

1,706 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • aged 18 years or older and admitted into ICU, with expected stay in ICU more than 72 hours or longer.

Exclusion criteria

  • under 18 years old, expected stay in ICU less than 72 hours, unconsented inclusion, ICU readmission, patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstruction disease, patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (defined as PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 100mmHg and PEEP ≥10cmH2O), decision to withhold life-sustaining treatment, physician forgetting to screen during 12 hours after admission, pregnancy, patients with acute myocardial infarction, paraquat poisoning and patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or planned to be on ECMO.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

1,706 participants in 2 patient groups

Low SpO2 group
Experimental group
Description:
SpO2 90-95%, with FiO2 as low as possible.
Treatment:
Other: SpO2 directed oxygen therapy
High SpO2 group
Active Comparator group
Description:
SpO2 96-100%, with FiO2 no lower than 30%.
Treatment:
Other: SpO2 directed oxygen therapy

Trial contacts and locations

13

Loading...

Central trial contact

Xiaobo Yang, MD; Shiying Yuan, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems