Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
In the present study, ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in the remission stage of the disease will be randomized into two groups: Alberta anti-inflammatory diet and Canada's Food Guide diet. The elements of Alberta anti-inflammatory diet have previously been shown to have a role in decreasing the risk of UC development or management of UC-related symptoms or relapse. Since the primary outcome of interest is the relapse rate in two groups, disease status will be assessed monthly using appropriate tools. In order to find out the underlying mechanisms that will relate the proposed diet to decreased flare rate, some laboratory evaluations, which are mainly markers of inflammation or are related to gut microbiome will be conducted. In the present study, the investigators will also perform state-of-the art metabolomics tests, in order to study how the dietary changes will change the end metabolites. In addition, the investigators will be able to explore if metabolomic profile of participants can predict future UC relapse. This study will last for 6 months from baseline wherein all the study subjects will receive appropriate dietary instructions in addition to their stable doses of maintenance drug therapy.
Full description
Recent research suggests that habitual dietary may play an important part in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but this has not been systematically explored. Habitual intake of a diet that is rich in "anti-inflammatory" nutrients (e.g. n-3 fatty acids, polyphenols), soluble fiber and other prebiotics (e.g. inulin), and probiotics (that improve gut microbiota) may lead to major improvements in IBD disease. Ultimately, the investigators are interested in studying the extent to which habitually eating foods, sources of these important nutrients and dietary components, might help people with IBD living in Alberta. Thus, the information about nutrients and dietary components must be translated to foods and dietary patterns that are acceptable and accessible to people in Alberta. This study will compare the effectiveness of 2 different approaches, either a structured, personalized menu plan constructed with a dietitian (intervention group) vs. general advice to follow Canada's Food Guide by a dietitian (control group), to promoting uptake and adherence to an appropriate diet. The control group will receive the same care as the intervention group as far as access to a registered dietitian. In the intervention group, the nutritional advice offered will be to follow a structured four-week menu plan that includes recipes and nutrition tips. The menu plan emphasizes specific foods that have been shown in the literature to improve IBD symptoms. In the control group, the nutritional advice will be general and will emphasize the principles outlined in Canada's Food Guide. Each control participant will be provided with their daily serving size allowance for each of the four food groups. Each participant will have sole responsibility in deciding which foods are selected from each food group; specific foods will not be highlighted.
Objectives: To evaluate if the proposed Alberta anti-inflammatory diet is effective for the prevention of relapses in ulcerative colitis as well as to determine their protective mechanisms
Study Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial Study Population and Number of Subjects: 70 patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission Duration of Treatment: 6 months Primary Endpoint: Patient relapse rate over 6 months Secondary Endpoints: Changes in: 1) Time to relapse; 2) Patients' quality of life during the study period; 3) Mucosal inflammation, measured by fecal calprotectin at baseline, months 1, 3, 6 or at relapse; 4) Partial Mayo score at the baseline and monthly, or at a relapse; 5) Laboratory markers of inflammation
Subject visits:
Screening Visit
Visit Month 0 (baseline), 1, 3, 6 (or at relapse)
Visit at Month 2, 4, 5
Studies to Evaluate Mechanisms of Action of the Alberta anti-inflammatory diet:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
53 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal