ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Personalized Radiotherapy for Individualized Treatment Strategies and Monitoring (PRISM)

The University of Texas System (UT) logo

The University of Texas System (UT)

Status and phase

Enrolling
Phase 1

Conditions

Brain Metastases
Solid Tumor, Adult
Small Cell Lung Cancer Extensive Stage

Treatments

Radiation: Cohort B: Brain metastasis PULSAR (Personalized ultrahypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy)
Radiation: Cohort A: Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Thoracic Tumor PULSAR (Personalized ultrahypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07139990
20251050

Details and patient eligibility

About

To characterize feasibility, safety, and/or preliminary efficacy of personalized strategies to adapt standard radiotherapy treatments to individual patient responses.

Full description

Cohort-Specific Rationale

COHORT A (ES-SCLC Personalized ultrahypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (PULSAR) Thoracic Tumor):

Chemoimmunotherapy with 4-6 cycles of platinum/etoposide and PD-L1 (Programmed Death-Ligand 1 protein) inhibition has become the standard systemic therapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), based on modest but significant OS (overall survival) benefits seen with the addition of either atezolizumab or durvalumab to chemotherapy in the IMpower133 and CASPIAN trials, respectively. However, outcomes remain poor with median OS of only 12.3 months. Notably, consolidative thoracic RT (radiotherapy) was not allowed either trial. This contrasts with prior signal for potential benefit for addition of thoracic RT to standard chemotherapy in ES-SCLC in the CREST trial, though this was not duplicated the RTOG 0937. Encouraging preliminary safety data has been published for addition of hypofractionated thoracic RT to single agent PD-1 inhibition after response to induction chemotherapy (6% grade 3 toxicity), but toxicities with doublet immune checkpoint blockade (ipilimumab/nivolumab) and RT showed a nearly 20% rate of high grade AEs (adverse events). This has led to an ongoing cooperative study (NRG LU007) seeking to define the impact of consolidative thoracic RT given with atezolizumab following induction chemotherapy. In the interim, while use of thoracic RT consolidation in ES-SCLC remains supported as a standard of care by guidelines, its implementation is variable. Particularly important open question involve timing for synergy/additivity with immune checkpoint blockade and cytotoxic therapy, minimization of target size for safety, and tailoring of dose according to patient need given significant competing risks for extra-thoracic progression and tolerance. In seeking to address this, this study notes that small cell lung cancer generally shrinks rapidly with each cycle of chemoimmunotherapy. Delivering a "pulse" of RT to the thoracic disease immediately prior to cycles 2-6 of chemoimmunotherapy may result in faster tumor response and reduction of overall treatment target size. Moreover, prolongation of time between doses enables observation of response, which would allow investigators to withhold further RT dose in those unlikely to benefit due to extra-thoracic progression or exceptional early response of thoracic disease.

COHORT B (Brain metastasis PULSAR):

Brain metastases from solid tumors affect nearly 30% of patients who die of cancer and present an increasing challenge for management as patients live longer with improved systemic therapies. Treatment often includes radiotherapy, increasingly delivered as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to spare normal brain. For larger lesions or those near sensitive areas, fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) delivered in up to 5 treatments is used to reduce swelling and late injury. Prolongation of the duration between fSRT treatments from days to weeks further has enabled adjustments of the treatment target to tumor size changes over treatment, further reducing healthy brain exposure without sacrifice in tumor control (7). UT Southwestern has expanded upon this modified fSRT approach with PULSAR. Based upon observed kinetics of response, the predominant PULSAR approach has been to deliver treatments in two "pulses" given as 3 fractions every other day, 3-4 week break, and then 2 final fractions every other day. In the initial experience (n=109 treated lesions), PULSAR demonstrated favorable efficacy and tolerability in treating brain metastases (2-year 90% local control and <10% grade 3 toxicity), when compared to historical fSRT reports especially for larger >=2cm lesions. PULSAR for brain metastases thus shows high potential to address larger tumors and to individualize RT dose/intensity, especially in the setting of increasing numbers of central nervous system (CNS)-active systemic agents.

In particular, with longer patient survivals, there remains a critical need to reduce the risk of toxicity and edema by de-escalating dose in addition to target size. The best 'biomarker' for such de-escalation appears to be early radiographic response, with published work strongly correlating a >=20% lesion volume reduction by 3-months to improved local control. Notably, such reductions are commonly seen in time for decision making in the PULSAR approach, with the collected data previously showing a median 38% reduction in larger tumors (>=2cm) during treatment. Specifically, ~50% of patients achieve a 25% reduction by pulse 2. In this cohort, the study will assess whether a more conservative >=25% tumor volume at interim imaging of PULSAR can be used to omit the second "pulse" for "responders," while retaining high control rates.

Enrollment

45 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Cohort A:

  • >=18 years old
  • Performance status ECOG 0-2
  • Extensive stage small cell lung cancer diagnosed by tissue biopsy within 180 days of registration.
  • Patient must be planned for or receiving standard of care chemoimmunotherapy.
  • Patient must have received no more than 3 cycles by time of study enrollment.
  • Able and indicated according to investigator to receive thoracic radiotherapy

Cohort B:

  • 18 years old
  • Diagnosis of solid tumor malignancy with MRI-defined brain metastasis lesions (1-5 lesions allowed) within 60 days of registration
  • Each brain metastasis lesion enrolled must be 2 - 5 cm, except brainstem lesions which may be 1.5 - 5cm in size.

Exclusion criteria

Cohort A:

⨀ Prior thoracic Radiotherapy

Cohort B:

  • Prior whole brain Radiotherapy
  • Prior surgical resection or focal radiotherapy of a target brain metastasis
  • Leptomeningeal disease

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

45 participants in 2 patient groups

COHORT A (ES-SCLC PULSAR Thoracic Tumor):
Experimental group
Description:
PULSAR with online adaptive planning to 7-10 Gy per fraction for up to 3 pulses directed at the bulkiest sites of disease in the thorax before infusion days (window: D-1 to D-4; optimal D-1) of three cycles of chemoimmunotherapy. The first radiotherapy pulse must be delivered before chemoimmunotherapy cycle 4. The three "pulses" of radiotherapy ideally should be given with consecutive cycles of systemic therapy. Radiotherapy can be suspended if a complete clinical response is reached before all 3 pulses are delivered. Chemoimmunotherapy will be given per standard of care
Treatment:
Radiation: Cohort A: Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Thoracic Tumor PULSAR (Personalized ultrahypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy)
COHORT B (Brain metastasis PULSAR):
Experimental group
Description:
PULSAR will be delivered in a 2 "pulse" strategy: 1: Deliver fSRT/SRS every other day (minimum 48 hour separation between treatments, minimum 1 treatment per week;begin and complete within 60 days of registration) for 3 fractions. Pulse 1 must begin and complete within 60 days of registration; 2) Repeat treatment planning MRI will be performed after 4 weeks (window: +/-1 weeks) after fraction 3 and volumetric response assessment made; 3) Pulse 2 is omitted in those with \>=25% volumetric size reduction response. In others, pulse 2 will deliver fSRT/SRS every other day (minimum 48 hour separation between treatments, minimum 1 treatment per week). Pulse 2 may deliver higher dose per fraction within Section 4.1.3.4 specifications (Table 6), rationale for this would be for addressing lesions that either due to large size or proximity to critical structures could only be treated to a lower dose range in pulse 1. Pulse 2 must begin 4 weeks (+/-1 weeks) after end of Pulse 1.
Treatment:
Radiation: Cohort B: Brain metastasis PULSAR (Personalized ultrahypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

SARAH NEUFELD; NEIL DESAI, MD, MHS

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems