Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The accumulation of uremic toxins is detrimental to physiological systems and induces premature biological aging. Renal function assessment methods, such as predictive formulas, may be influenced by ancestry in Brazilians, given the country's ethnic diversity, resulting in inaccurate estimates. On the other hand, physical exercise is an important ally in treating chronic kidney disease (CKD) as it induces metabolic changes that help slow the disease's progression. Additionally, the anti-aging effect conferred on those who engage in physical exercise is widely recognized. However, investigations into the impact of physical exercise on the concentration of uremic toxins and biological aging in patients with chronic kidney disease and their relationship with ancestry are still in the early stages and inconclusive. The investigators aim to track uremic toxins, exerkines, genetic aspects, nutritional profile, physical fitness, body composition, and the effects of different types of physical training (periodized and progressive) in people with chronic kidney disease at various stages. Additionally, to verify associations between these factors and their effects on different physiological systems. This is a triple-blind randomized clinical trial, with a 10-year follow-up of patients. The sampling will be non-probabilistic in terms of accessibility or convenience. Adult volunteers of both biological sexes aged 18 or older, with chronic kidney disease in conservative treatment (stages 2, 3, 4, and 5, n~400), patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, n~800), and transplant recipients (n~400) will be recruited from different hemodialysis centers. After being grouped by disease stage, patients will be randomized according to pre-training variables and then allocated to the following groups: control group (CTL; at least n~100), strength training (ST; at least n~100), aerobic training (AT; at least n~100), and combined training (CT; at least n~100). The patients will undergo evaluations of body composition, cardiorespiratory capacity, muscle strength, autonomic nervous system function, and nutritional, psychological, and biomolecular assessments. The training protocols will be adjusted according to the patient's physical capacity, always considering periodization and progression.
Full description
This study is a randomized, triple-blind clinical trial with a 10-year follow-up. Sampling is non-probabilistic by accessibility or convenience. Recruitment: Recruitment will be widely promoted via mass media (social media, TV) to invite individuals with chronic kidney disease. Additionally, the investigators will receive referrals from partner physicians and public-private partnerships. Participants will be recruited from dialysis clinics, outpatient clinics, and hospitals in Brasília, DF, respecting privacy and confidentiality. The investigators aim to recruit a minimum of 1,600 adult patients (both sexes), aged 18+, divided into those with CKD in conservative treatment (stages 2, 3, 4, 5, n~400), renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, n~800), and kidney transplant patients (n~400). Participants will receive all pertinent information about the study and potential risks and benefits. Those who agree will sign an informed consent form. Following consent, each patient will undergo a comprehensive history assessment, including exercise, medical, and nutritional histories, along with an analysis of their medical records. Monthly evaluations will cover all procedures and interventions outlined for their allocated group. Patient Randomization: Participants will be stratified by CKD stage (conservative treatment, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and post-transplant) and further randomized by pre-training variables (biological sex, body weight, BMI, and body composition), using an online application. Patients will then be allocated to one of four groups: control (CTL; n~100), strength training (ST; n~100), aerobic training (AT; n~100), and combined training (CT; n~100). Assessments: Body Composition: BMI, DEXA, 7-Skinfold (Jackson and Pollock protocol); Cardiopulmonary Capacity: Anaerobic threshold, Fitcheck, respiratory muscle strength, spirometry; Muscle Strength: 1RM, handgrip, isokinetic force and power, E-lastic portable dynamometer; Autonomic Nervous System: Cardiovascular regulation during deep breathing, Valsalva maneuver with handgrip exercise, post-exercise ischemia, cold-water hand immersion, perceived exertion, respiratory rate, heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation, HRV, BPV, spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity, EEG, cognitive assessment; Nutritional Assessment: 24-hour dietary recall, food frequency questionnaire; Psychological Assessment: Quality of life (KDQOL-SF36), sleep quality, Beck Depression Inventory; Biochemical and biomolecular Assessments: Biological sample collection (urine, feces, saliva, blood) for measurements of creatinine, cystatin-C, leptin, GDF-15, TGF-β, insulin, albumin, SIRT-1, C-reactive protein, irisin, intact FGF23, C-terminal FGF23, ADMA, soluble α-Klotho, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol, LDL-c, HDL-c, triglycerides, myeloperoxidase, lipoperoxidation assay, paraoxonase-1, total antioxidant capacity, nitric oxide, lactate, creatine kinase, uremic toxins (KIM-1, NGAL, indoxyl sulfate, p-cresyl sulfate, TMAO, TNF-α, IL-6, ADMA, exercise-related proteins, BDNF, DNA and RNA isolation (salting out method), telomere length and telomerase activity, microRNA expression analysis, HPLC quantification, and identification of compounds by MALDI TOF/TOF mass spectrometry); Ancestry Analysis: Ancestry genome-wide association stratification; Training Protocols: Physical training protocols will include strength, aerobic, and combined training; Statistical Analysis: Sample size is calculated for 99% power (1-β = 0.99) with an alpha of 5% (α = 0.05) and effect size of 0.1, resulting in 400 patients. Descriptive analysis will be presented in tables and charts. Normality and homogeneity of data will be tested by Shapiro-Wilk and Levene's tests. For normally distributed data, group comparisons will be conducted by two-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test for significant differences. Non-normally distributed data will be analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's post-test, with results expressed as medians and interquartile ranges. Significance will be set at p < 0.05, with effect size calculated by Cohen's d. Associations between variables will be evaluated by Spearman's correlation. To minimize type II error, the investigators will calculate variations before and after training as Δ = post-training - pre-training. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and individual variability analysis will use delta results to identify key variables affecting estimated glomerular filtration rate. This analysis will use the Past software (v4.09). Typical error and smallest worthwhile change (SWC) will be calculated per Swinton et al. (2018). Effect size will follow Hopkins' scale: <0.2 (trivial), 0.2-0.6 (small), 0.6-1.2 (moderate), 1.2-2.0 (large), 2.0-4.0 (very large), >4.0 (extremely large). Additionally, K-means cluster analysis, an unsupervised machine learning method, will identify patterns based on numerical distance between variables. Statistical analyses will use Microsoft Excel® 2010, GraphPad Prism 6.0, R and RStudio (v4.1.3), and SPSS (v.21.0).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
1,600 participants in 8 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Thiago S Rosa, PhD; Lysleine A Deus, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal