ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Pilot Study to Investigate the Creation of Physiological Rhythm by Closed Loop Stimulation in hEart Failure pAtients With chronoTropic incompEtence (BIO|CREATE)

B

Biotronik

Status

Completed

Conditions

CPX
Heart Failure

Treatments

Device: Cardiac Resynchronization therapy device with Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The study assesses the effect of Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) on the ventilatory efficiency slope and estimates the patient responder rate to CLS in patients with severe chronotropic incompetence treated with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device.

Full description

In patients with pharmacological refractory heart failure (HF), systolic dysfunction, and cardiac dyssynchrony, the cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces the risk of death, and improves symptoms and quality of life.

A considerable portion (80%) of patients with a CRT indication has a chronotropic incompetence (CI). CI usually induces a stress intolerance which negatively affects the quality of life. In addition of being a marker of diminished exercise capacity, severe CI (sCI) may be an independent predictor of mortality.

The sensor-based rate adaption provided by the implanted CRT device delivers a possible therapeutic approach for the CI.

Usually, rate adaption is achieved by an accelerometer. The previous studies in terms of effectiveness of rate adaption in CRT patients with CI showed inconsistent results.

In addition to an accelerometer to deliver the rate adaption BIOTRONIK provides closed loop stimulation (CLS) as unique feature in a CRT device. CLS determines the appropriate heart rate based on intra-cardiac impedance measurements. These measurements reflect changes of the cardiac contraction dynamics in reaction to information coming from the autonomic nervous system. CLS takes the information on the contraction dynamics and translates it into an adequate heart rate adaptation, thus delivering physiologically appropriate therapy.

Enrollment

30 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • CRT class I indication at time of implantation, according to current guidelines
  • Implantation of CRT-device including CLS > 6 months prior to enrollment
  • Stable heart failure status for at least 1 month
  • Optimal cardiovascular drug treatment according to current guidelines
  • NYHA class II or III
  • Patient is able to comply with the protocol
  • Patient provided written informed consent
  • Stable location of residence

Exclusion criteria

  • Planned cardiovascular intervention within the next 3 months
  • Admission for decompensated heart failure or acute coronary syndrome in the preceding 3 months
  • Ongoing symptoms of myocardial ischemia
  • Known persistent, long-standing persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation
  • COPD with GOLD ≥ 3
  • Planned absence of residence for more than one week during study period
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Participation in another interventional clinical investigation
  • Age < 18 years
  • Placed in an institution due to official decree or judicial order
  • Dependent from the sponsor, the clinical site or the investigators

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

30 participants in 2 patient groups

Pacing mode with CLS
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: Cardiac Resynchronization therapy device with Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS)
Intrinsic mode
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: Cardiac Resynchronization therapy device with Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems