Pinhole Surgical Technique With And Without Use Of Buttons For Treatment Of Multiple Gingival Recessions: RCT

Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital

Status and phase: Unknown; Phase 4

Conditions: Gingival Recession

Treatments: Procedure: Pinhole surgery with and without buttons

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT02632968

02_D012_44452

Details and patient eligibility

About

Pinhole surgical technique is a novel minimally invasive, predictable, efficient, time and cost-effective technique for treatment of multiple gingival recession. This procedure involves no releasing incision, suturing or sharp dissections. It has been shown that the greater post-operative displacement of gingival margin may cause greater root coverage. Based on this hypothesis, a split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was planned to compare the clinical outcome of pinhole surgical technique with and without the use of orthodontic buttons and sutures in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions.

Full description

To achieve multiple adjacent recession coverage and an optimal integration of the associated tissues is even more challenging and a complex endeavour in comparison to isolated gingival recessions. Treatment protocol and outcome with different surgical procedures depends on a variety of factors like recession, defect size, presence or absence of keratinized tissue adjacent to the defect, width and height of inter-dental soft tissue, depth of vestibule, presence of frenum, post-operative stabilization and final position of advanced gingival margin. The final position of the GM plays a critical role in achieving CRC. Based on this hypothesis, a split mouth clinical trial was planned to compare the clinical outcome of pinhole surgical technique with and without the use of orthodontic buttons and sutures in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions.

METHOD The aim of this split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was to clinically compare and evaluate the effectiveness and predictability of Pinhole surgical technique alone and its modification with orthodontic buttons and sutures in 80 sites for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions and to assess the influence of these surgical procedures on the gingival and periodontal health, in the maxillary arch for six months post surgically. Gingival recession depth (GRD), Gingival margin location post-surgery, Gingival recession width (GRW), Root coverage esthetic score (RES), Complete root coverage (CRC), Probing depth (PD), Clinical attachment level (CAL), Keratinized tissue width (KTW), Plaque index (PI), Gingival index (GI), Gingival bleeding index (GBI) will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after treatment.

Enrollment: 80 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 25 to 55 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Multiple (atleast two or three) Millers class I and II or combined class I and II recession defects18 affecting adjacent teeth of the maxillary arch.
• Patients with thick gingival biotypes >0.8mm.
• Presence of adequate keratinized tissue apical to recession > 1mm.
• Age group 25-55 years.
• Patients with history of compliance to oral hygiene instructions and a full mouth plaque score of <10%.
• Patients willing to participate in the study.
• American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status I or II.
• No contra-indications for periodontal surgery.
• Non-Smokers.
• Patients with esthetic concerns.

Exclusion criteria

• Recession defects associated with caries/demineralization, restorations, and deep abrasions (step >2mm).
• No occlusal interferences.
• Teeth with evidence of pulpal pathology.
• Patients who have undergone any previous periodontal surgical procedures at the involved sites.
• Pregnant and lactating women.
• Patients on medications known to interfere with periodontal tissue health or healing.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

80 participants in 2 patient groups

Pinhole surgery with orthodontic buttons

Active Comparator group

Description:

Pinhole surgery with orthodontic buttons The selected participants were assigned in test and control. In the test group orthodontic buttons were cemented on the bid-buccal region of the crown with dual cure GIC. After administration of LA, 2 to 3 pinhole incisions were made and a full thickness muco-periosteal tunnel was raised and collagen membrane was tucked in through the pinhole incisions. The sling sutures 5-0 mersilk were placed to hold the tunnel in an advanced location using orthodontic buttons as anchoring units. Inter-dental sutures with 6-0 mersilk were also placed for stabilization of the advanced gingival tissue.

Treatment:

Procedure: Pinhole surgery with and without buttons

Pinhole surgery without buttons

Active Comparator group

Description:

Pinhole surgery without orthodontic buttons The selected participants were assigned in test and control. In the control group, after administration of LA, 2 to 3 pinhole incisions were made and a full thickness muco-periosteal tunnel was raised and collagen membrane was tucked in through the pinhole incisions till the recession defects were covered. No sutures or orthodontic buttons were used in the control site.

Treatment:

Procedure: Pinhole surgery with and without buttons