Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
This clinical trial evaluates the use of novel decision support educational materials and services using health coaches. The study includes men newly diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. A 160 men will be recruited. Half of the men will receive a call from a health coach before their initial consultation visit with their urologist to review their treatment concerns and questions. The other half will receive usual care provided by the urologist, such as educational materials and services provided by the urologist.
Full description
A critical public health need exists for improved prognostic tools to distinguish aggressive from slow growing prostate cancer at diagnosis, and for better support systems to guide patients in decision-making regarding management options.
Decision support interventions that are tailored to specific clinical conditions are known to have increased patient self-efficacy, knowledge, question-asking, and satisfaction; and decreased decisional conflict, regret, anxiety, and distress.
To reduce the risk of over-treatment, our team has developed individual risk prediction models that we have now integrated into our decision support intervention (DSI).
Delivering such decision support intervention should increase patient knowledge and question-asking by the patient to their doctor.
The decision support intervention can be delivered by telephone and or the Internet.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Male >=18 years of age and newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) (within 3-months).
Documentation of a low-risk PCa diagnosis as evidenced by clinical features of the following criteria:
PSA test at diagnosis <=15 ng/ml
Localized PCa (cT1/T2,N0,M0)
Biopsy Gleason grade 2-6 OR (or 3+4 AND <=33% cores are positive for adenocarcinoma)
***A minimum of 10 diagnostic cores taken by a systematic directed approach. Sampling may be obtained by target transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or MRI imaging.
No treatment yet
English language proficient and ability to provide informed consent
Managing urologist considers them a candidate for active surveillance
Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study, including the ability to read and speak English.
Exclusion criteria
Participants will be ineligible if they:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
119 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal