Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
We will conduct a randomized, within-subjects clinical study to compare short-term pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) vaping liquids vs. smoked cannabis containing 6 equivalent standard THC units (5 mg THC=1 Standard THC Unit (STU)) in healthy community members who are current users of both products. While smoking cannabis remains the most common mode of THC use among adults and youth, alternative modes of delivery, such as Electronic Vaping Products (EVPs), are becoming increasingly popular for the delivery of cannabinoids. Declining cannabis risk perceptions, increasing normalization of cannabis, greater legal access and availability to cannabis, ease of administration, and ability to conceal vaped THC use have likely contributed to increasing prevalence of use throughout the population across all age groups. Comparing vaping THC containing liquids with smoking cannabis can serve as an important benchmark for evaluating the delivery and effects of THC vaping products and, their relative safety
Full description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. Compare the PK/PD profiles of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) from equivalent standard THC doses (30mg) administered as vaped THC liquid vs. smoked cannabis using a within-subject design.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Safety
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. Compare the PK/PD profiles of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) from equivalent standard THC doses (30mg) administered as vaped THC liquid vs. smoked cannabis using a within-subject design.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Safety
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
• Illegal or non-prescription drug use within the past 90 days. As detected by NacroCheck® Évolutive® (detection in human urine of the 12 most currently abused drugs) at the first session and prior to receiving any study product
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
40 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Danielle Smith
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal