Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
This study aims to conduct a randomized controlled trial to investigate the difference in clinical efficacy and blinding effect between real acupuncture and various sham acupuncture techniques.
Full description
This study aimed to recruit 150 patients with knee osteoarthritis from the hospital outpatient department. Random coding was generated using a computer network-based random system, and the subjects will be divided into five groups: real acupuncture, non-acupuncture at real-acupoint, shallow acupuncture at real-acupoint, shallow acupuncture at non-meridian and non-acupoint, and waiting treatment group in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Acupuncture sessions were conducted three times a week for two weeks. Patients in the waiting treatment group did not receive acupuncture therapy during the study period but received acupuncture treatment after the trial. Outcome measures included Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) score, Visual Analogue Pain (VAS) score, Massachusetts General Hospital Acupuncture Sensation Scale (MASS) needle sensation score, and blind evaluation scale. Data collection occurred at baseline, one week, and two weeks.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
150 participants in 5 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Xin Sun, Doctor; Jiali Liu, Doctor
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal