Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Pleural disease i.e. with effusions or pneumothorax have a high disease burden to patients. This is because most patients require diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the form of drainage and biopsies. With increasing age, the incidence of pleural disease is likely to rise with concomitant rise in pulmonary malignancy and infection.
The impact of pleural disease, especially ambulatory drainage depends not only on patient factors such as effusion size, cardiopulmonary co-morbidities and underlying aetiology. It also depends on socioeconomic factors such as ability to afford ambulatory equipment (which is not covered by Medisave), availability of care-givers and coping mechanisms.
To phenotype patients presenting to Singapore General Hospital with pleural disease and evaluate impact on outcomes of pleural interventions
This study will collect existing or prospective data that is part of standard clinical care
Full description
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE
Pleural disease i.e. with effusions or pneumothorax have a high disease burden to patients. This is because most patients require diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the form of drainage and biopsies. With increasing age, the incidence of pleural disease is likely to rise with concomitant rise in pulmonary malignancy and infection.
The impact of pleural disease, especially ambulatory drainage depends not only on patient factors such as effusion size, cardiopulmonary co-morbidities and underlying aetiology. It also depends on socioeconomic factors such as ability to afford ambulatory equipment (which is not covered by Medisave), availability of care-givers and coping mechanisms.
Therefore, translating internationally accepted pleural interventions into an Asian context, moreover a Singaporean one, is challenging.
HYPOTHESIS AND OBJECTIVES
Asian patients with pleural disease have unique phenotypes and outcomes from pleural interventions
To phenotype patients presenting to Singapore General Hospital with pleural disease and evaluate impact on outcomes of pleural interventions
EXPECTED RISKS AND BENEFITS
There are likely to be no benefits to subjects. They will not be subject to any novel therapy and their clinical data will only be collected.
Risks are minimal because patients are subject to only standard therapy and existing clinical data collected. There will be no new additional interventions, consultations or hospital visits. They will be asked to complete validated quality of life surveys that will be included into the clinical record.
STUDY POPULATION
4.1. List the number and nature of subjects to be enrolled.
Patients will only be enrolled from those who present to Singapore General Hospital (either in an ambulatory or inpatient setting). There is no exclusion of women, children or minorities, although clinical catchment includes mostly adult patients.
4.2. Criteria for Recruitment and Recruitment Process
Subjects will be recruited if they already have radiographic evidence of pleural disease.
4.3. Inclusion Criteria
The subject must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to participate in this study.
4.4. Exclusion Criteria Subjects who no radiographic evidence of pleural disease or who are unwilling/unable to provide informed consent
STUDY DESIGN AND PROCEDURES/METHODOLOGY
This study will collect existing or prospective data that is part of standard clinical care
Data that will be collected
Subjects may withdraw voluntarily from participation in the study at any time. They will have standard care as indicated by the managing physician
SAFETY MEASUREMENTS 6.1. Definitions
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence that occurs as a result of the study. This will reported to CRIB.
6.2. Collecting, Recording and Reporting of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events to CIRB
PI will be responsible for submitting to the approving CIRB the completed serious AE Reporting Form within 7 calendar days after the investigator is aware of the event, followed by a complete report within 8 additional calendar days. AE that are related events should be reported at least annually (together with Study Status Report for annual review).
6.3. Safety Monitoring Plan
Not applicable. Current standard investigations and treatment to be provided to all subjects.
6.4. Complaint Handling
Complaints about the study will be escalated to the clinical Head of Department and included in reports to the CIRB.
DATA ANALYSIS
7.1. Data Quality Assurance
Data collection will be done by the investigators through the clinical team managing the patient to ensure completion and accuracy.
7.2. Data Entry and Storage
SAMPLE SIZE AND STATISTICAL METHODS
8.1. Determination of Sample Size
The sample size is determined by the number of patients accrued into the database during the study period. As this is a non-comparative study, study size calculation not applicable.
8.2. Statistical and Analytical Plans
DIRECT ACCESS TO SOURCE DATA/DOCUMENTS
The CRIB will be permitted to audit the database as needed. Source documents are from electronic medical records.
QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
Data collection will be done by the investigators through the clinical team managing the patient to ensure completion and accuracy.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
11.1. Informed Consent
Informed consent will be sought from the patient or legal guardian (in the case of minors) by the study investigators before any data collection is done.
11.2. Confidentiality of Data and Patient Records
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
The subject must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to participate in this study.
Exclusion criteria
100 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal