Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is increasingly used for the treatment of achalasia. In published series, a 12cm-POEM is usually performed. Surgical myotomy is typically shorter (8cm). The clinical efficacy of both procedure is comparable.
This study intends to investigate if clinical outcomes of POEM depends on the length of esophageal myotomy, in patients with classic-type achalasia (type I and type II according to Chicago Classification)
Full description
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy myotomy (POEM) has been recently introduced for treatment of achalasia, based on technical developments from NOTES (natural orifice translumenal surgery). The technique includes the incision of the mucosa in the esophageal body, the submucosal dissection of the distal esophagus and the creation of a submucosal tunnel in the distal esophagus and proximal gastric body, and the esophageal myotomy. The procedure is performed transorally, using a flexible endoscope.
In published series, a 12cm-POEM is usually performed. Surgical myotomy is typically shorter, being protracted for about 8cm. The clinical efficacy of POEM and surgical myotomy is more likely to be similar according to the most recent published series.
In this randomized controlled trial (non-inferiority trial) we evaluate the outcomes of POEM according to the length of the esophageal myotomy.
Patients with type I and II achalasia will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups, long--myotomy (LM) and short--myotomy (SM).
Patients in the LM-group will receive a 12cm-long POEM (including 3cm on the stomach); in the SM-group patients will undergo a POEM extended for 7 cm (including 3cm on the stomach).
During follow-up, High Resolution Manometry (HRM), Esophageal pH-monitoring study and Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) will be regularly performed and symptoms assessed with the use of the Eckardt score (ECKs).
The main hypothesis is that the results of a SM are not inferior to the results of a LM. Calculated sample size is 200 patients
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
200 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Pietro Familiari, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal