Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this clinical trial is to examine if and how the implementation of point-of care-tests (POCT) for sexually transmitted infections in the management of abnormal vaginal discharge reduces the overtreatment with antibiotics in a low income country. The setting is a university hospital in a semi-rural area in Nepal and several of its rural out-reach-centers. The plan is to include 1500 women attending the gynecological outpatients with a problem of vaginal discharge over approximately a one year period.
The main questions the clinical trial aims to answer are:
Participants will be randomized in three groups:
Full description
Abnormal vaginal discharge (AVD) is a common problem women seek treatment for allover the world. In low and low- middle income countries (LLMICs) about one third of these women will have a sexually transmitted disease (STI) caused by Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoea (NG) or Trichomonal vaginalis (TV). Approximately another third will have an imbalance in the vaginal microbiotic flora, bacterial vaginosis (BV). These women and their sexual partners in the case of sexually transmitted diseases will benefit from specific antibiotic treatment. The last third of women will not have any infection and there are indications that psychosocial problems may be expressed as somatic complaints, for example of abnormal vaginal discharge in some cultures.
In high income countries, with the help of laboratory-based tests, available after few days, treatment is usually with a narrow spectrum antibiotic for specific bacteria. This involves less risk for the development of antibiotic resistance. In low-income countries, laboratory testing is not feasible due to costs and logistics. Women are usually receiving antibiotic treatment with several types of antibiotics to cover STIs. More recently, point-of -care tests which are nearly as accurate as laboratory-based tests have been developed. Implementation studies for these tests in LLMICs are lacking. However, these molecular tests are still expensive.
In this study the investigators propose a combination of molecular tests for the two most serious infections (CT and NG) and a cheap and simple tests for TV and BV, which both are treated with the same type of antibiotic.
In addition, women attending an outpatient department in a LLMIC setting, expect (antibiotic) treatment, which they will not receive with a negative POCT. In LLMICs it is common practice to purchase over the counter medication, inclusive antibiotics. In particular for women with negative POCT results, there could be a lack of adherence to treatment recommendations.
We want to examine the following research questions (RQ) in the context of treatment for vaginal discharge:
For this purpose, a RCT with three arms was designed:
(A) Treatment as usual, (B) Treatment according to POCT results, (C) Treatment according to POCT results and additional patient information on vaginal discharge and antibiotics and screening and available counseling for psychosocial problems.
The investigators plan to include 1500 women with the complaint of abnormal vaginal during a 10-12 month period at Dhulikhel hospital, a tertiary university hospital in central Nepal and selected outreach centers in 2024 and 2025.
Sample size calculation are based on RQ1 and RQ2, feasibility of recruitment and the precision of the estimates, a two-sided 95 % confidence intervals (CI). For RQ1, the use of any antibiotics will be assessed in both POCT arms combined versus the treatment as usual arm (n = 1500), whilst the effect of the educational material on the use of over-the-counter medications will be assessed in the POCTplus versus the POCT group (n = 1000). As many as 85% of women with AVD are over-treated with antibiotics in LLMICs, around 50 % receive antimicrobial resistance driving antibiotics and it is expected, that around 40 % women in the POCT group will subsequently seek over the counter antibiotics. With 1500 participants randomized 1:1:1, a 10 to 20 percentage point reduction in any of these measures will produce CIs with a width between 8 and 12 % and at least 90% power. When allowing for around 40 % loss to follow-up, when assessing the use of over-the-counter antibiotics, the expected width of the CI is still around 15 %.
The investigators will collect self-sampled urine and vaginal swabs from all included women and a self-administered questionnaire with a color-coded audio-computer. The questionnaire contains demographic information and a validated tool to screen for anxiety, depression and domestic violence.
Gold standard testing for the STIs and BV will be performed on all women. Participants will be randomized into three arms. In the standard treatment arm, the attending health practitioner will not be informed about POCT results. In the two POCT arms, the health care practitioner will be informed about CT and NG status and about the pH, inclusive a confirmatory whiff test.
Addition (22.09.2024): after the first 100 participants it was recognized, that sensitivity of the combination pH and whiff test was unacceptably low for TV for women with a high pH and negative whiff test. We will add another low cost, immunological POCT for TV for women with a high pH and a negative whiff test after the first half of participants has been enrolled. Based on our additional power calculation, we will have sufficient power to seperately analyse the diagnostic accuracy for TV both before and after the addition of this test.
In the POCT-PLUS arm, patients will receive additional educational information about physiological and abnormal vaginal discharge and about potentially negative effects of antibiotic treatment. In this arm, woman screening positive for positive for anxiety, depression or domestic violence will be offered psychological counseling or referral to a crisis center Participants will be followed up telephonically after 1 and 4 months.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
1,500 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Risa AM Lonnee-Hoffmann, PhD; Sunila Shakya, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal